These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


151 related items for PubMed ID: 23426848

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical correlation of a new MR imaging method for assessing lumbar foraminal stenosis.
    Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Rho MH, Hong HP, Kwag HJ, Kook SH, Choi SH.
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 May; 33(5):818-22. PubMed ID: 22241383
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Clinical correlation of a new practical MRI method for assessing cervical spinal canal compression.
    Park HJ, Kim SS, Chung EC, Lee SY, Park NH, Rho MH, Choi SH.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):W197-201. PubMed ID: 22826421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A practical MRI grading system for cervical foraminal stenosis based on oblique sagittal images.
    Park HJ, Kim SS, Lee SY, Park NH, Chung EC, Rho MH, Kwon HJ, Kook SH.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120515. PubMed ID: 23410800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Inter-observer reliability and clinical validity of the MRI grading system for cervical central stenosis based on sagittal T2-weighted image.
    Lee KH, Park HJ, Lee SY, Kim MS, Lee YT, Kim YB, Kim JN, Youn I.
    Eur J Radiol; 2020 Jun; 127():108987. PubMed ID: 32298959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Congenital lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective, control-matched, cohort radiographic analysis.
    Singh K, Samartzis D, Vaccaro AR, Nassr A, Andersson GB, Yoon ST, Phillips FM, Goldberg EJ, An HS.
    Spine J; 2005 Jun; 5(6):615-22. PubMed ID: 16291100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain Using a Novel Rapid-Acquisition Three-Dimensional SPACE Sequence at 1.5-T: A Pilot Study Comparing Lumbar Stenosis Assessment With Routine Two-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Sequences.
    Swami VG, Katlariwala M, Dhillon S, Jibri Z, Jaremko JL.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Nov; 67(4):368-378. PubMed ID: 27245289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Qualitative versus quantitative lumbar spinal stenosis grading by machine learning supported texture analysis-Experience from the LSOS study cohort.
    Huber FA, Stutz S, Vittoria de Martini I, Mannil M, Becker AS, Winklhofer S, Burgstaller JM, Guggenberger R.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():45-50. PubMed ID: 31005175
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A new comprehensive MRI classification and grading system for lumbosacral central and lateral stenosis: clinical application and comparison with previous systems.
    Spinnato P, Petrera MR, Parmeggiani A, Manzetti M, Ruffilli A, Faldini C, D'Agostino V, Di Carlo M, Cumani MP, Crombé A, Matcuk GR, Miceli M.
    Radiol Med; 2024 Jan; 129(1):93-106. PubMed ID: 37882917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Observer variability based on the strength of MR scanners in the assessment of lumbar degenerative disc disease.
    Cihangiroglu M, Yildirim H, Bozgeyik Z, Senol U, Ozdemir H, Topsakal C, Yilmaz S.
    Eur J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 51(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 15294326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.