These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 23426849

  • 1. Relationship between T2 relaxation and apparent diffusion coefficient in malignant and non-malignant prostate regions and the effect of peripheral zone fractional volume.
    Simpkin CJ, Morgan VA, Giles SL, Riches SF, Parker C, deSouza NM.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 86(1024):20120469. PubMed ID: 23426849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Probing structure of normal and malignant prostate tissue before and after radiation therapy with luminal water fraction and diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Carlin D, Orton MR, Collins D, deSouza NM.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):619-627. PubMed ID: 30589150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prostate tumor volume measurement with combined T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted MR: correlation with pathologic tumor volume.
    Mazaheri Y, Hricak H, Fine SW, Akin O, Shukla-Dave A, Ishill NM, Moskowitz CS, Grater JE, Reuter VE, Zakian KL, Touijer KA, Koutcher JA.
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 19703883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical utility of apparent diffusion coefficient values obtained using high b-value when diagnosing prostate cancer using 3 tesla MRI: comparison between ultra-high b-value (2000 s/mm²) and standard high b-value (1000 s/mm²).
    Kitajima K, Takahashi S, Ueno Y, Yoshikawa T, Ohno Y, Obara M, Miyake H, Fujisawa M, Sugimura K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 36(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 22371381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. What is the most effective tool for detecting prostate cancer using a standard MR scanner?
    Osugi K, Tanimoto A, Nakashima J, Shinoda K, Hashiguchi A, Oya M, Jinzaki M, Kuribayashi S.
    Magn Reson Med Sci; 2013 Dec 25; 12(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 24172787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
    Ding K, Yao Y, Gao Y, Lu X, Chen H, Tang Q, Hua C, Zhou M, Zou X, Yin Q.
    Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep 25; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.
    Tamada T, Sone T, Jo Y, Toshimitsu S, Yamashita T, Yamamoto A, Tanimoto D, Ito K.
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep 25; 28(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 18777532
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate transition-zone cancer.
    Yoshizako T, Wada A, Hayashi T, Uchida K, Sumura M, Uchida N, Kitagaki H, Igawa M.
    Acta Radiol; 2008 Dec 25; 49(10):1207-13. PubMed ID: 19031184
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Diagnostic evaluation of magnetization transfer and diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer detection in a re-biopsy population.
    Barrett T, McLean M, Priest AN, Lawrence EM, Patterson AJ, Koo BC, Patterson I, Warren AY, Doble A, Gnanapragasam VJ, Kastner C, Gallagher FA.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Aug 25; 28(8):3141-3150. PubMed ID: 29222677
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
    Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Feuth T, Witjes JA, Fütterer JJ, Barentsz JO.
    Radiology; 2013 Jan 25; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of interreader reproducibility of the prostate imaging reporting and data system and likert scales for evaluation of multiparametric prostate MRI.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Lim RP, Haghighi M, Somberg MB, Babb JS, Taneja SS.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct 25; 201(4):W612-8. PubMed ID: 24059400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. High-resolution prostate diffusion MRI using eddy current-nulled convex optimized diffusion encoding and random matrix theory-based denoising.
    Zhang Z, Aygun E, Shih SF, Raman SS, Sung K, Wu HH.
    MAGMA; 2024 Aug 25; 37(4):603-619. PubMed ID: 38349453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Does normalisation improve the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient values for prostate cancer assessment? A blinded independent-observer evaluation.
    Rosenkrantz AB, Khalef V, Xu W, Babb JS, Taneja SS, Doshi AM.
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Sep 25; 70(9):1032-7. PubMed ID: 26126712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.