These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

162 related items for PubMed ID: 23433947

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The impact of negative forensic evidence on mock jurors' perceptions of a trial of drug-facilitated sexual assault.
    Jenkins G, Schuller RA.
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Aug; 31(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 17211690
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL, Brondino MJ, Brown H, Braithwaite RL.
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Expert testimony and the effects of a biological approach, psychopathy, and juror attitudes in cases of insanity.
    Rendell JA, Huss MT, Jensen ML.
    Behav Sci Law; 2010 Feb; 28(3):411-25. PubMed ID: 20014145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A meta-analysis of the emotional victim effect for female adult rape complainants: Does complainant distress influence credibility?
    Nitschke FT, McKimmie BM, Vanman EJ.
    Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 145(10):953-979. PubMed ID: 31282696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Who needs capacity?
    Buchanan A.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015 Oct; 40():1-5. PubMed ID: 25939285
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA, Lieberman JD, Olson J.
    Behav Sci Law; 2004 Oct; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A neurolaw perspective on psychiatric assessments of criminal responsibility: decision-making, mental disorder, and the brain.
    Meynen G.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013 Oct; 36(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 23433730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.