These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

192 related items for PubMed ID: 23450013

  • 1. The three-dimensional relationship between acetabular rim morphology and the severity of femoral cam lesions.
    Masjedi M, Nightingale CL, Azimi DY, Cobb JP.
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Mar; 95-B(3):314-9. PubMed ID: 23450013
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.
    Pascual-Garrido C, Li DJ, Grammatopoulos G, Yanik EL, Clohisy JC, ANCHOR Group.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 May; 477(5):1021-1033. PubMed ID: 30998630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Can combining femoral and acetabular morphology parameters improve the characterization of femoroacetabular impingement?
    Bouma HW, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E, Krekel P, van Kampen PM.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1396-403. PubMed ID: 25384428
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Cams and pincer impingement are distinct, not mixed: the acetabular pathomorphology of femoroacetabular impingement.
    Cobb J, Logishetty K, Davda K, Iranpour F.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Aug; 468(8):2143-51. PubMed ID: 20431974
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Correlation of pelvic incidence with cam and pincer lesions.
    Gebhart JJ, Streit JJ, Bedi A, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ, Salata MJ.
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2649-53. PubMed ID: 25201443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Relationship between proximal femoral and acetabular alignment in normal hip joints using 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Buller LT, Rosneck J, Monaco FM, Butler R, Smith T, Barsoum WK.
    Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):367-75. PubMed ID: 22031856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Prevalence of Femoral and Acetabular Version Abnormalities in Patients With Symptomatic Hip Disease: A Controlled Study of 538 Hips.
    Lerch TD, Todorski IAS, Steppacher SD, Schmaranzer F, Werlen SF, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M.
    Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jan; 46(1):122-134. PubMed ID: 28937786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR, Shin Y, Agrawal P, Elhabian SY, Whitaker RT, Weiss JA, Aoki SK, Peters CL, Anderson AE.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Combining femoral and acetabular parameters in femoroacetabular impingement: the omega surface.
    Bouma H, Hogervorst T, Audenaert E, van Kampen P.
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Nov; 53(11):1239-46. PubMed ID: 26446831
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Computer-assisted modeling of osseous impingement and resection in femoroacetabular impingement.
    Bedi A, Dolan M, Magennis E, Lipman J, Buly R, Kelly BT.
    Arthroscopy; 2012 Feb; 28(2):204-10. PubMed ID: 22244100
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. 3D CT segmentation of CAM type femoroacetabular impingement-reliability and relationship of CAM lesion with anthropomorphic features.
    Zhang L, Wells JE, Dessouky R, Gleason A, Chopra R, Chatzinoff Y, Fey NP, Xi Y, Chhabra A.
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Dec; 91(1092):20180371. PubMed ID: 30168728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Twelve percent of hips with a primary cam deformity exhibit a slip-like morphology resembling sequelae of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.
    Albers CE, Steppacher SD, Haefeli PC, Werlen S, Hanke MS, Siebenrock KA, Tannast M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 473(4):1212-23. PubMed ID: 25448326
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A method of assessing the severity of cam type femoro-acetabular impingement in three dimensions.
    Masjedi M, Azimi DY, Nightingale CL, Harris SJ, Cobb JP.
    Hip Int; 2012 Apr; 22(6):677-82. PubMed ID: 23161227
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Acetabular Version Increases After Closure of the Triradiate Cartilage Complex.
    Albers CE, Schwarz A, Hanke MS, Kienle KP, Werlen S, Siebenrock KA.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):983-994. PubMed ID: 27586654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hip shape is symmetric, non-dependent on limb dominance and gender-specific: implications for femoroacetabular impingement. A 3D CT analysis in asymptomatic subjects.
    Mascarenhas VV, Rego P, Dantas P, Castro M, Jans L, Marques RM, Gouveia N, Soldado F, Ayeni OR, Consciência JG.
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Apr; 28(4):1609-1624. PubMed ID: 29110047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Editorial Commentary: Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Requires Dynamic Assessment of Beta-Angle (Femoroacetabular Excursion Angle) and Consideration of Femoral and Acetabular Version: Cam Impingement in Patients With Acetabular or Femoral Retroversion May Warrant Greater Osteoplasty.
    Carreira D, Kurapatti M.
    Arthroscopy; 2023 Sep; 39(9):2023-2025. PubMed ID: 37543386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Letter to the editor: Cams and pincer impingement are distinct, not mixed: the acetabular pathomorphology of femoroacetabular impingement.
    Beck M.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Apr; 469(4):1207; author reply 1208-9. PubMed ID: 21290205
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.