These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

718 related items for PubMed ID: 23454345

  • 1. Biodiversity of small molecules--a new perspective in screening set selection.
    Petrone PM, Wassermann AM, Lounkine E, Kutchukian P, Simms B, Jenkins J, Selzer P, Glick M.
    Drug Discov Today; 2013 Jul; 18(13-14):674-80. PubMed ID: 23454345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Plate-based diversity selection based on empirical HTS data to enhance the number of hits and their chemical diversity.
    Sukuru SC, Jenkins JL, Beckwith RE, Scheiber J, Bender A, Mikhailov D, Davies JW, Glick M.
    J Biomol Screen; 2009 Jul; 14(6):690-9. PubMed ID: 19531667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Efficient search of chemical space: navigating from fragments to structurally diverse chemotypes.
    Wassermann AM, Kutchukian PS, Lounkine E, Luethi T, Hamon J, Bocker MT, Malik HA, Cowan-Jacob SW, Glick M.
    J Med Chem; 2013 Nov 14; 56(21):8879-91. PubMed ID: 24117015
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Novel trends in high-throughput screening.
    Mayr LM, Bojanic D.
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct 14; 9(5):580-8. PubMed ID: 19775937
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Active-learning strategies in computer-assisted drug discovery.
    Reker D, Schneider G.
    Drug Discov Today; 2015 Apr 14; 20(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 25499665
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. How diverse are diversity assessment methods? A comparative analysis and benchmarking of molecular descriptor space.
    Koutsoukas A, Paricharak S, Galloway WR, Spring DR, Ijzerman AP, Glen RC, Marcus D, Bender A.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jan 27; 54(1):230-42. PubMed ID: 24289493
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Rethinking molecular similarity: comparing compounds on the basis of biological activity.
    Petrone PM, Simms B, Nigsch F, Lounkine E, Kutchukian P, Cornett A, Deng Z, Davies JW, Jenkins JL, Glick M.
    ACS Chem Biol; 2012 Aug 17; 7(8):1399-409. PubMed ID: 22594495
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Plate-based diversity subset screening generation 2: an improved paradigm for high-throughput screening of large compound files.
    Bell AS, Bradley J, Everett JR, Loesel J, McLoughlin D, Mills J, Peakman MC, Sharp RE, Williams C, Zhu H.
    Mol Divers; 2016 Nov 17; 20(4):789-803. PubMed ID: 27631533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Hit finding: towards 'smarter' approaches.
    Langer T, Hoffmann R, Bryant S, Lesur B.
    Curr Opin Pharmacol; 2009 Oct 17; 9(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 19576852
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Expanding the medicinally relevant chemical space with compound libraries.
    López-Vallejo F, Giulianotti MA, Houghten RA, Medina-Franco JL.
    Drug Discov Today; 2012 Jul 17; 17(13-14):718-26. PubMed ID: 22515962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Early phase drug discovery: cheminformatics and computational techniques in identifying lead series.
    Duffy BC, Zhu L, Decornez H, Kitchen DB.
    Bioorg Med Chem; 2012 Sep 15; 20(18):5324-42. PubMed ID: 22938785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The opportunities of mining historical and collective data in drug discovery.
    Wassermann AM, Lounkine E, Davies JW, Glick M, Camargo LM.
    Drug Discov Today; 2015 Apr 15; 20(4):422-34. PubMed ID: 25463034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Visual characterization and diversity quantification of chemical libraries: 1. creation of delimited reference chemical subspaces.
    Le Guilloux V, Colliandre L, Bourg S, Guénegou G, Dubois-Chevalier J, Morin-Allory L.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug 22; 51(8):1762-74. PubMed ID: 21761916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Mining for bioactive scaffolds with scaffold networks: improved compound set enrichment from primary screening data.
    Varin T, Schuffenhauer A, Ertl P, Renner S.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jul 25; 51(7):1528-38. PubMed ID: 21615076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Bioturbo similarity searching: combining chemical and biological similarity to discover structurally diverse bioactive molecules.
    Wassermann AM, Lounkine E, Glick M.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar 25; 53(3):692-703. PubMed ID: 23461561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cheminformatics approaches to analyze diversity in compound screening libraries.
    Akella LB, DeCaprio D.
    Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2010 Jun 25; 14(3):325-30. PubMed ID: 20457001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Stratified high-throughput screening sets enable flexible screening strategies from a single plated collection.
    Nissink JW, Schmitt S, Blackburn S, Peters S.
    J Biomol Screen; 2014 Mar 25; 19(3):369-78. PubMed ID: 23918919
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The European Lead Factory: An updated HTS compound library for innovative drug discovery.
    van Vlijmen H, Ortholand JY, Li VM, de Vlieger JSB.
    Drug Discov Today; 2021 Oct 25; 26(10):2406-2413. PubMed ID: 33892142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Chemical and biological properties of frequent screening hits.
    Che J, King FJ, Zhou B, Zhou Y.
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Apr 23; 52(4):913-26. PubMed ID: 22435989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Affinity-based screening techniques: their impact and benefit to increase the number of high quality leads.
    Bergsdorf C, Ottl J.
    Expert Opin Drug Discov; 2010 Nov 23; 5(11):1095-107. PubMed ID: 22827747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 36.