These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis after the failure of a tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Malottki K, Barton P, Tsourapas A, Uthman AO, Liu Z, Routh K, Connock M, Jobanputra P, Moore D, Fry-Smith A, Chen YF. Health Technol Assess; 2011 Mar; 15(14):1-278. PubMed ID: 21439251 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness modelling of biological treatment sequences in moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis in France. Saraux A, Gossec L, Goupille P, Bregman B, Boccard E, Dupont D, Beresniak A. Rheumatology (Oxford); 2010 Apr; 49(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 20081224 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Indirect cost-effectiveness analyses of abatacept and rituximab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis in the United States. Yuan Y, Trivedi D, Maclean R, Rosenblatt L. J Med Econ; 2010 Mar; 13(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 20001596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The economic burden of biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: cost-effectiveness analysis of sub-cutaneous anti-TNFalpha treatment in Italian patients. Benucci M, Li Gobbi F, Sabadini L, Saviola G, Baiardi P, Manfredi M. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2009 Mar; 22(4):1147-52. PubMed ID: 20074482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]