These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

159 related items for PubMed ID: 2347075

  • 1. Comparative evaluation of surface deposits on high water content hydrogel contact lens polymers.
    Tomlinson A, Caroline P.
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 2347075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Pseudomonas attachment to low-water and high-water, ionic and nonionic, new and rabbit-worn soft contact lenses.
    Lawin-Brussel CA, Refojo MF, Leong FL, Kenyon KR.
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1991 Mar; 32(3):657-62. PubMed ID: 1900499
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Early deposition trends on group I (Polymacon and Tetrafilcon A) and group III (Bufilcon A) materials.
    Franklin V, Horne A, Jones L, Tighe B.
    CLAO J; 1991 Oct; 17(4):244-8. PubMed ID: 1764770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Clinical comparison of Omafilcon A with four control materials.
    Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M.
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):249-58. PubMed ID: 9348449
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Scanning electron microscopy of deposits remaining in soft contact lens polishing marks after cleaning.
    Fowler SA, Gaertner KL.
    CLAO J; 1990 Oct; 16(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 2379309
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Ocular and subjective responses to frequent replacement of daily wear soft contact lenses.
    Pritchard N, Fonn D, Weed K.
    CLAO J; 1996 Jan; 22(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 8835070
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Parameter stability of soft contact lenses made from different materials.
    Tranoudis I, Efron N.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2004 Sep; 27(3):115-31. PubMed ID: 16303535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Six month clinical evaluation of a biomimetic hydrogel contact lens.
    Young G, Bowers R, Hall B, Port M.
    CLAO J; 1997 Oct; 23(4):226-36. PubMed ID: 9348446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Ex vivo protein deposition on bi-weekly silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Boone A, Heynen M, Joyce E, Varikooty J, Jones L.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Nov; 86(11):1241-9. PubMed ID: 19770811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bacterial populations on 30-night extended wear silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Keay L, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF, Morris CA, Harmis N, Corrigan K, Holden BA.
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 11215603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro assessment of medical device toxicity: interactions of benzalkonium chloride with silicone-containing and p-hema-containing hydrogel contact lens materials.
    Dracopoulos A, Dixon DG, Jones LW, Sivak JG, Bantseev V.
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 Jan; 33(1):26-37. PubMed ID: 17224676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparative study of biweekly disposable contact lenses: silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel.
    Cheung SW, Cho P, Chan B, Choy C, Ng V.
    Clin Exp Optom; 2007 Mar; 90(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 17311574
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.