These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

480 related items for PubMed ID: 23475530

  • 1. Combined non-invasive functional and anatomical diagnostic work-up in clinical practice: the magnetic resonance and computed tomography in suspected coronary artery disease (MARCC) study.
    Groothuis JG, Beek AM, Brinckman SL, Meijerink MR, van den Oever ML, Hofman MB, van Kuijk C, van Rossum AC.
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Jul; 34(26):1990-8. PubMed ID: 23475530
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
    Manka R, Paetsch I, Kozerke S, Moccetti M, Hoffmann R, Schroeder J, Reith S, Schnackenburg B, Gaemperli O, Wissmann L, Wyss CA, Kaufmann PA, Corti R, Boesiger P, Marx N, Lüscher TF, Jahnke C.
    Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Direct comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance and multidetector computed tomography stress-rest perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease.
    Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Ferreira N, Sampaio F, Pires-Morais G, Santos L, Melica B, Rodrigues A, Braga P, Azevedo L, Teixeira M, Leite-Moreira A, Silva-Cardoso J, Nagel E, Gama V.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar 12; 61(10):1099-107. PubMed ID: 23375929
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. 3D fusion of functional cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography coronary angiography: accuracy and added clinical value.
    Donati OF, Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Kuehnel C, Hennemuth A, Wyss C, Azemaj N, Plass A, Kozerke S, Falk V, Leschka S, Stolzmann P.
    Invest Radiol; 2011 May 12; 46(5):331-40. PubMed ID: 21285891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0 Tesla for the identification of myocardial ischaemia: comparison with coronary catheter angiography and fractional flow reserve measurements.
    Ebersberger U, Makowski MR, Schoepf UJ, Platz U, Schmidtler F, Rose J, Kessel A, Roth P, Antoni D, Schnackenburg B, Helmberger T, Rieber J, Hoffmann E, Leber AW.
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec 12; 14(12):1174-80. PubMed ID: 23907345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, Mueller S, Schweyer M, Koenig A, Schiele TM, Theisen K, Siebert U, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Klauss V.
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun 12; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Feuchtner G, Goetti R, Plass A, Wieser M, Scheffel H, Wyss C, Stolzmann P, Donati O, Schnabl J, Falk V, Alkadhi H, Leschka S, Cury RC.
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep 12; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance stress perfusion testing for the detection of coronary artery disease in women.
    Klem I, Greulich S, Heitner JF, Kim H, Vogelsberg H, Kispert EM, Ambati SR, Bruch C, Parker M, Judd RM, Kim RJ, Sechtem U.
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jul 12; 1(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 19356464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hybrid imaging using quantitative H215O PET and CT-based coronary angiography for the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Danad I, Raijmakers PG, Appelman YE, Harms HJ, de Haan S, van den Oever ML, Heymans MW, Tulevski II, van Kuijk C, Hoekstra OS, Lammertsma AA, Lubberink M, van Rossum AC, Knaapen P.
    J Nucl Med; 2013 Jan 12; 54(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 23232274
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Diagnostic performance of non-contrast-enhanced whole-heart magnetic resonance coronary angiography in combination with adenosine stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
    Heer T, Reiter S, Höfling B, Pilz G.
    Am Heart J; 2013 Dec 12; 166(6):999-1009. PubMed ID: 24268214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Diagnostic performance of static single-scan stress perfusion cardiac computed tomography in detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with combined invasive coronary angiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance-myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Song I, Yi JG, Park JH, Kim MY, Shin JK, Ko SM.
    Acta Radiol; 2018 Oct 12; 59(10):1184-1193. PubMed ID: 29320864
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography.
    Plein S, Radjenovic A, Ridgway JP, Barmby D, Greenwood JP, Ball SG, Sivananthan MU.
    Radiology; 2005 May 12; 235(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 15858084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.