These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Lumbar spinal canal dimensions measured intraoperatively after decompression are not properly rendered on early postoperative MRI. Schenck C, van Susante J, van Gorp M, Belder R, Vleggeert-Lankamp C. Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2016 May; 158(5):981-8. PubMed ID: 27005673 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via a paramedian or midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis at the L4/5 level. Komatsu J, Muta T, Nagura N, Iwabuchi M, Fukuda H, Kaneko K, Shirado O. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018 May; 26(2):2309499018782546. PubMed ID: 29938605 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Dural sac cross-sectional area does not correlate with efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in single level lumbar spinal stenosis. Park CH, Lee SH, Jung JY. Pain Physician; 2011 May; 14(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 21785481 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The application of classification of lateral region of lumbar spinal canal for treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis in geriatric patients using full endoscopic transforaminal decompression surgery]. Yang J, Wang Y, Kong Q. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr 15; 34(4):415-421. PubMed ID: 32291974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Decompression of lumbar canal stenosis with a bilateral interlaminar versus classic laminectomy technique: a prospective randomized study. Soliman MAR, Ali A. Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May 01; 46(5):E3. PubMed ID: 31042649 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]