These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

96 related items for PubMed ID: 2350745

  • 1. Comparison of in-situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrageniculate bypass.
    Ricci MA, Graham AM, Symes JF.
    Can J Surg; 1990 Jun; 33(3):216-20. PubMed ID: 2350745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Long-term patency of reversed and in situ femoro-popliteal bypasses].
    Marković DM, Davidović LB, Lotina SI, Kostić DM, Cinara IS, Svetković SD, Marković M, Zivanović N.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1999 Jun; 127(11-12):365-70. PubMed ID: 10686817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The influence of graft type on patency of infrainguinal arterial bypass grafts.
    Neale ML, Graham JC, Lane RJ, Cheung DS, Appleberg M.
    J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 8173726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. PTFE-vein composite grafts for critical limb ischaemia: a valuable alternative to all-autogenous infrageniculate reconstructions.
    Bastounis E, Georgopoulos S, Maltezos C, Alexiou D, Chiotopoulos D, Bramis J.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10426969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Prejudices and realities in the use of 'unsuitable' saphenous vein graft for infrapopliteal revascularization.
    Siani A, Accrocca F, Antonelli R, Giordano GA, Gabrielli R, Siani LM, Baldassarre E, Mounyergi F, Marcucci G.
    G Chir; 2008 Aug; 29(6-7):261-4. PubMed ID: 18544261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of reversed and in situ saphenous vein grafts for infragenicular bypass: experience of two surgeons.
    Sasajima T, Kubo Y, Kokubo M, Izumi Y, Inaba M.
    Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 1(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 8075994
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Factors determining late patency of aortobifemoral bypass graft].
    Davidović LB, Lotina SI, Kostić DM, Cinara II, Cvetković SD, Stojanov PL, Velimirović DB, Marković MM, Pejkić SA, Vukotić AM.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1997 Feb; 125(1-2):24-35. PubMed ID: 17974352
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The myth of the in situ graft: superiority in infrainguinal bypass surgery?
    Lawson JA, Tangelder MJ, Algra A, Eikelboom BC.
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 1999 Aug; 18(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 10428752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparing vein with collagen impregnated woven polyester prosthesis in above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting.
    Tofigh AM, Warnier De Wailly G, Rhissassi B.
    Int J Surg; 2007 Apr; 5(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 17448975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparative review of in situ versus reversed vein grafts in the 1980s.
    Calligaro KD, Friedell ML, Rollins DL, Semrow CM, Buchbinder D.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Mar; 172(3):247-52. PubMed ID: 1994504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Prospective randomized multicenter comparison of in situ and reversed vein infrapopliteal bypasses.
    Wengerter KR, Veith FJ, Gupta SK, Goldsmith J, Farrell E, Harris PL, Moore D, Shanik G.
    J Vasc Surg; 1991 Feb; 13(2):189-97; discussion 197-9. PubMed ID: 1990160
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Results of infrainguinal revascularization with reversed vein conduits: a modern control series.
    Mills JL, Taylor SM.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 1991 Mar; 5(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 2015186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Endoscopically assisted in situ lower extremity bypass graft: a preliminary report of a new minimally invasive technique.
    Suggs WD, Sanchez LA, Woo D, Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Veith FJ.
    J Vasc Surg; 2001 Oct; 34(4):668-72. PubMed ID: 11668322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Factors which affect long-term patency in femoro-popliteal bypass].
    Marković DM, Davidović LB, Lotina SI, Kostić DM, Colić M, Pejkić SU, Jakovljević NS, Djorić P.
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2000 Oct; 128(1-2):17-23. PubMed ID: 10916459
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Results of femoropopliteal and femorotibial greater saphenous vein in situ bypass. Life table analysis.
    Gruss JD, Hiemer W.
    Int Angiol; 1992 Oct; 11(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 1402221
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Non-greater saphenous vein grafting for infrageniculate bypass.
    Alexander J, Gutierrez C, Katz S.
    Am Surg; 2002 Jul; 68(7):611-4. PubMed ID: 12132743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of in situ and reversed saphenous vein grafts for infrainguinal reconstruction.
    Fogle MA, Whittemore AD, Couch NP, Mannick JA.
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jan; 5(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 3795391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The popliteal artery as inflow for distal bypass grafting.
    Brown PS, McCarthy WJ, Yao JS, Pearce WH.
    Arch Surg; 1994 Jun; 129(6):596-602. PubMed ID: 8204033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraoperative duplex monitoring of infrainguinal vein bypass procedures.
    Johnson BL, Bandyk DF, Back MR, Avino AJ, Roth SM.
    J Vasc Surg; 2000 Apr; 31(4):678-90. PubMed ID: 10753275
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Long term behavior of reversed saphenous vein grafts for advanced femoropopliteal disease.
    Dhall DP, Mavor GE.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1978 Feb; 146(2):241-3. PubMed ID: 622670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.