These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


398 related items for PubMed ID: 23509000

  • 1. The relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional resources for education in anatomy.
    Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, Wainman B.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):211-5. PubMed ID: 23509000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. "Let's get physical": advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy.
    Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, Weller R.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2013; 6(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 23349117
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Development of an experimental paradigm in which to examine human learning using two computer-based formats.
    Hoffman HM, Colt HG, Haas A.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 81():187-91. PubMed ID: 11317737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension.
    Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2012; 5(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 22232125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The Minnesota pelvic trainer: a hybrid VR/physical pelvis for providing virtual mentorship.
    Konchada V, Shen Y, Burke D, Argun OB, Weinhaus A, Erdman AG, Sweet RM.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():280-2. PubMed ID: 21335805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models.
    Berney S, Bétrancourt M, Molinari G, Hoyek N.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):452-62. PubMed ID: 25689057
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Virtual reality anatomy: is it comparable with traditional methods in the teaching of human forearm musculoskeletal anatomy?
    Codd AM, Choudhury B.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2011; 4(3):119-25. PubMed ID: 21480538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ultrasound simulator-assisted teaching of cardiac anatomy to preclinical anatomy students: A pilot randomized trial of a three-hour learning exposure.
    Canty DJ, Hayes JA, Story DA, Royse CF.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 24706544
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Virtual reality and brain anatomy: a randomised trial of e-learning instructional designs.
    Levinson AJ, Weaver B, Garside S, McGinn H, Norman GR.
    Med Educ; 2007 May; 41(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 17470079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Transforming clinical imaging data for virtual reality learning objects.
    Trelease RB, Rosset A.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 May; 1(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19177381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Implementing a virtual reality paradigm in human anatomy/physiology college curricula.
    St Aubin H.
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001 May; 81():475-8. PubMed ID: 11322134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Less is more: development and evaluation of an interactive e-atlas to support anatomy learning.
    Guy R, Pisani HR, Rich P, Leahy C, Mandarano G, Molyneux T.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015 May; 8(2):126-32. PubMed ID: 24816995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of an interactive computer-based method with a conventional reading approach for learning pelvic anatomy.
    Corton MM, McIntire DD, Wai CY, Ling FW, Wendel GD.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1438-43. PubMed ID: 16996462
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Coupled physical and digital cadaver dissection followed by a visual test protocol provides insights into the nature of anatomical knowledge and its evaluation.
    Hisley KC, Anderson LD, Smith SE, Kavic SM, Tracy JK.
    Anat Sci Educ; 2008 Jan; 1(1):27-40. PubMed ID: 19177376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.