These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
300 related items for PubMed ID: 2351092
1. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials. Wee AS, Ashley RA. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Anodal block: can this occur during routine nerve conduction studies? Wee AS, Leis AA, Kuhn AR, Gilbert RW. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2000; 40(7):387-91. PubMed ID: 11142109 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Study on the latency difference between compound muscle and sensory nerve action potentials]. Hasegawa O, Gondo G, Wada N, Matsumoto S, Mimura E. No To Shinkei; 2001 Jun; 53(6):541-5. PubMed ID: 11436338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of the surface EMG electrode on the compound muscle action potential. Barkhaus PE, Periquet MI, Nandedkar SD. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jun; 46(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 16929630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Characteristics of electrical discharges by transcranial cortex stimulation activated motor units of the hand muscles of the human]. Hess CW, Mills KR, Murray NM. EEG EMG Z Elektroenzephalogr Elektromyogr Verwandte Geb; 1988 Dec; 19(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 3145182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of different types of surface electrodes on amplitude, area and duration of the compound muscle action potential. Jonas D, Bischoff C, Conrad B. Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 110(12):2171-5. PubMed ID: 10616123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Compound motor action potential interexaminer variability in photoguided placement of the recording electrodes. Axelson HW. J Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 29(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 22659720 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Muscle compound motor action potentials from esophago-vertebral electrical stimulation of the spinal cord in the normal awake man. Caccia MR, Valla PL, Osio M, Mangoni A. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(8):493-501. PubMed ID: 10627936 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of surface electrode size on computer simulated surface motor unit potentials. Ferdjallah M, Wertsch JJ, Harris GF. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1999 Dec; 39(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 10421996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A new electrode placement for recording the compound motor action potential of the first dorsal interosseous muscle. Seror P, Maisonobe T, Bouche P. Neurophysiol Clin; 2011 Oct; 41(4):173-80. PubMed ID: 22078729 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. CMAP variability as a function of electrode site and size. van Dijk JG, Tjon-a-Tsien A, van der Kamp W. Muscle Nerve; 1995 Jan; 18(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7800000 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of the best electrode position for recording of the diaphragm compound muscle action potential. Dionne A, Parkes A, Engler B, Watson BV, Nicolle MW. Muscle Nerve; 2009 Jul; 40(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 19533636 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Branched EMG electrodes for stable and selective recording of single motor unit potentials in humans. Christova L, Stephanova D, Kossev A. Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 17313346 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]