These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

197 related items for PubMed ID: 23515675

  • 1. Maternal diabetes causes alterations of DNA methylation statuses of some imprinted genes in murine oocytes.
    Ge ZJ, Liang XW, Guo L, Liang QX, Luo SM, Wang YP, Wei YC, Han ZM, Schatten H, Sun QY.
    Biol Reprod; 2013 May; 88(5):117. PubMed ID: 23515675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The loss of imprinted DNA methylation in mouse blastocysts is inflicted to a similar extent by in vitro follicle culture and ovulation induction.
    Saenz-de-Juano MD, Billooye K, Smitz J, Anckaert E.
    Mol Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 22(6):427-41. PubMed ID: 26908643
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Oocyte growth-dependent progression of maternal imprinting in mice.
    Hiura H, Obata Y, Komiyama J, Shirai M, Kono T.
    Genes Cells; 2006 Apr; 11(4):353-61. PubMed ID: 16611239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Methylation dynamics of imprinted genes in mouse germ cells.
    Lucifero D, Mertineit C, Clarke HJ, Bestor TH, Trasler JM.
    Genomics; 2002 Apr; 79(4):530-8. PubMed ID: 11944985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of low methyl donor levels in culture medium during mouse follicle culture on oocyte imprinting establishment.
    Anckaert E, Romero S, Adriaenssens T, Smitz J.
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Sep; 83(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 20393167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Embryonic imprinting perturbations do not originate from superovulation-induced defects in DNA methylation acquisition.
    Denomme MM, Zhang L, Mann MR.
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Sep; 96(3):734-738.e2. PubMed ID: 21782164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Diabetic uterus environment may play a key role in alterations of DNA methylation of several imprinted genes at mid-gestation in mice.
    Ge ZJ, Liang QX, Luo SM, Wei YC, Han ZM, Schatten H, Sun QY, Zhang CL.
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2013 Dec 30; 11():119. PubMed ID: 24378208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Human in vitro oocyte maturation is not associated with increased imprinting error rates at LIT1, SNRPN, PEG3 and GTL2.
    Kuhtz J, Romero S, De Vos M, Smitz J, Haaf T, Anckaert E.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Sep 30; 29(9):1995-2005. PubMed ID: 24963167
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Diploid parthenogenetic embryos adopt a maternal-type methylation pattern on both sets of maternal chromosomes.
    Liu JH, Zhu JQ, Liang XW, Yin S, Ola SI, Hou Y, Chen DY, Schatten H, Sun QY.
    Genomics; 2008 Feb 30; 91(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18036775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reproductive and epigenetic outcomes associated with aging mouse oocytes.
    Lopes FL, Fortier AL, Darricarrère N, Chan D, Arnold DR, Trasler JM.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2009 Jun 01; 18(11):2032-44. PubMed ID: 19293340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Dual effects of superovulation: loss of maternal and paternal imprinted methylation in a dose-dependent manner.
    Market-Velker BA, Zhang L, Magri LS, Bonvissuto AC, Mann MR.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2010 Jan 01; 19(1):36-51. PubMed ID: 19805400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Gene-specific timing and epigenetic memory in oocyte imprinting.
    Lucifero D, Mann MR, Bartolomei MS, Trasler JM.
    Hum Mol Genet; 2004 Apr 15; 13(8):839-49. PubMed ID: 14998934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Dynamics of imprinted DNA methylation and gene transcription for imprinting establishment in mouse oocytes in relation to culture duration variability.
    Anckaert E, Sánchez F, Billooye K, Smitz J.
    Biol Reprod; 2013 Dec 15; 89(6):130. PubMed ID: 24108304
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Side-by-side comparison of five commercial media systems in a mouse model: suboptimal in vitro culture interferes with imprint maintenance.
    Market-Velker BA, Fernandes AD, Mann MR.
    Biol Reprod; 2010 Dec 15; 83(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 20702853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.