These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


226 related items for PubMed ID: 23527342

  • 1. Effect of multiple use of impression copings on the accuracy of implant transfer.
    Alikhasi M, Bassir SH, Naini RB.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 23527342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
    Rashidan N, Alikhasi M, Samadizadeh S, Beyabanaki E, Kharazifard MJ.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M, Garg P, Prithviraj DR.
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An in vitro evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal- and external-connection implant prostheses.
    Vigolo P, Mutinelli S, Fonzi F, Stellini E.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014 Apr; 29(4):807-18. PubMed ID: 25032760
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
    Al-Abdullah K, Zandparsa R, Finkelman M, Hirayama H.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An In Vitro Study.
    Khan SA, Singh S, Neyaz N, Jaiswal MM, Tanwar AS, Singh A.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb 01; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant and abutment level impression techniques: effect on marginal discrepancy.
    Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Monzavi A, Momen-Heravi F.
    J Oral Implantol; 2011 Dec 01; 37(6):649-57. PubMed ID: 20594060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. An Investigation of the Effect of Modifying and Reusing Impression Copings on Transfer of Implant Analog Position and Angulation.
    Gallardo FF, Salmon CA, Lien W, Sheridan RR, Batzer RC, Vandewalle KS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Mar 01; 21(3):220-226. PubMed ID: 32434964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Feng C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb 01; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Passive fit and accuracy of three dental implant impression techniques.
    Al Quran FA, Rashdan BA, Zomar AA, Weiner S.
    Quintessence Int; 2012 Feb 01; 43(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 22257873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparative study of the accuracy between plastic and metal impression transfer copings for implant restorations.
    Fernandez MA, Paez de Mendoza CY, Platt JA, Levon JA, Hovijitra ST, Nimmo A.
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul 01; 22(5):367-76. PubMed ID: 23387412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.