These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
503 related items for PubMed ID: 23527900
1. A comparative study of hearing aids and round window application of the vibrant sound bridge (VSB) for patients with mixed or conductive hearing loss. Marino R, Linton N, Eikelboom RH, Statham E, Rajan GP. Int J Audiol; 2013 Apr; 52(4):209-18. PubMed ID: 23527900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Functional outcomes of Vibrant Soundbridge applied on the middle ear windows in comparison with conventional hearing aids. Gunduz B, Atas A, Bayazıt YA, Goksu N, Gokdogan C, Tutar H. Acta Otolaryngol; 2012 Dec; 132(12):1306-10. PubMed ID: 23039370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss. Mojallal H, Schwab B, Hinze AL, Giere T, Lenarz T. Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery. Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jun; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data. Grégoire A, Van Damme JP, Gilain C, Bihin B, Garin P. Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Functional results of Vibrant Soundbridge middle ear implants in conductive and mixed hearing losses. Bernardeschi D, Hoffman C, Benchaa T, Labassi S, Beliaeff M, Sterkers O, Grayeli AB. Audiol Neurootol; 2011 Feb; 16(6):381-7. PubMed ID: 21228566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Vibrant SoundBridge application to middle ear windows versus conventional hearing aids: a comparative study based on international outcome inventory for hearing aids. Atas A, Tutar H, Gunduz B, Bayazıt YA. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2014 Jan; 271(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23400404 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A new vibroplasty coupling technique as a treatment for conductive and mixed hearing losses: a report of 4 cases. Huber AM, Mlynski R, Müller J, Dillier N, Holzmann D, Wolframm MD, Hagen R. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):613-7. PubMed ID: 22429947 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The bone conduction implant: Clinical results of the first six patients. Reinfeldt S, Håkansson B, Taghavi H, Fredén Jansson KJ, Eeg-Olofsson M. Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 25705995 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Round window stimulation with the Vibrant Soundbridge: Comparison of direct and indirect coupling. Olszewski L, Jedrzejczak WW, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski H. Laryngoscope; 2017 Dec; 127(12):2843-2849. PubMed ID: 28220497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. European multi-centre study of the Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant. Lenarz T, James C, Cuda D, Fitzgerald O'Connor A, Frachet B, Frijns JH, Klenzner T, Laszig R, Manrique M, Marx M, Merkus P, Mylanus EA, Offeciers E, Pesch J, Ramos-Macias A, Robier A, Sterkers O, Uziel A. Int J Audiol; 2013 Dec; 52(12):838-48. PubMed ID: 23992489 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results]. Lenarz T, Weber BP, Issing PR, Gnadeberg D, Ambjørnsen K, Mack KF, Winter M. Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study. Truy E, Philibert B, Vesson JF, Labassi S, Collet L. Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Wireless and acoustic hearing with bone-anchored hearing devices. Bosman AJ, Mylanus EA, Hol MK, Snik AF. Int J Audiol; 2015 Jul; 55(7):419-24. PubMed ID: 27176657 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss. Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF. Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window. Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY. Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]