These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

133 related items for PubMed ID: 23529923

  • 1. A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.
    Xie Y, Chen Z, Albert PS.
    Stat Med; 2013 Sep 10; 32(20):3472-85. PubMed ID: 23529923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimating diagnostic accuracy of raters without a gold standard by exploiting a group of experts.
    Zhang B, Chen Z, Albert PS.
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec 10; 68(4):1294-302. PubMed ID: 23006010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Random effects modeling approaches for estimating ROC curves from repeated ordinal tests without a gold standard.
    Albert PS.
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun 10; 63(2):593-602. PubMed ID: 17688512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests with intermediate results in the absence of a gold standard.
    Xu H, Black MA, Craig BA.
    Stat Med; 2013 Jul 10; 32(15):2571-84. PubMed ID: 23212851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP, Mitani AA, Edwards D.
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep 10; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs.
    Albert PS.
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep 10; 63(3):947-57. PubMed ID: 17825024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Measuring rater bias in diagnostic tests with ordinal ratings.
    Kim C, Lin X, Nelson KP.
    Stat Med; 2021 Jul 30; 40(17):4014-4033. PubMed ID: 33969509
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Modeling rater diagnostic skills in binary classification processes.
    Lin X, Chen H, Edwards D, Nelson KP.
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb 20; 37(4):557-571. PubMed ID: 29094378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests using latent class models that account for conditional dependence between tests: a simulation study.
    Keddie SH, Baerenbold O, Keogh RH, Bradley J.
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Mar 10; 23(1):58. PubMed ID: 36894883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A Bayesian model for misclassified binary outcomes and correlated survival data with applications to breast cancer.
    Luo S, Yi M, Huang X, Hunt KK.
    Stat Med; 2013 Jun 15; 32(13):2320-34. PubMed ID: 22996169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Measuring and estimating diagnostic accuracy when there are three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C, van Belle G, Miller JP, Morris JC.
    Stat Med; 2006 Apr 15; 25(7):1251-73. PubMed ID: 16345029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Estimating disease prevalence in the absence of a gold standard.
    Black MA, Craig BA.
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep 30; 21(18):2653-69. PubMed ID: 12228883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An ROC-type measure of diagnostic accuracy when the gold standard is continuous-scale.
    Obuchowski NA.
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb 15; 25(3):481-93. PubMed ID: 16287217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Improving the reliability of diagnostic tests in population-based agreement studies.
    Nelson KP, Edwards D.
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar 15; 29(6):617-26. PubMed ID: 20128018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Assessing rater performance without a "gold standard" using consensus theory.
    Weller SC, Mann NC.
    Med Decis Making; 1997 Mar 15; 17(1):71-9. PubMed ID: 8994153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Quantifying rater variation for ordinal data using a rating scale model.
    Zhang S, Petersen JH.
    Stat Med; 2018 Jun 30; 37(14):2223-2237. PubMed ID: 29663479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.