These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Medicine and the law: treatment of minors--consent requirements. Young MG. Tex Med; 1983 Jan; 79(1):72-4. PubMed ID: 6687501 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. State legislation on abortion after Roe v. Wade: selected constitutional issues. Bryant MD. Am J Law Med; 1976 Jan; 2(1):101-32. PubMed ID: 973625 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Law would remove ability of institutional review boards to waive written consent. Maloney DM. Hum Res Rep; 1996 Aug; 11(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Enrolling HIV-positive adolescents in mental health research: A case study reflecting on legal and ethical complexities. Woollett N, Peter J, Cluver L, Brahmbhatt H. S Afr Med J; 2017 Jul 28; 107(8):679-683. PubMed ID: 28809613 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Preserving the right to choose: a minor's right to confidential reproductive health care. Bertuglia J. Womens Rights Law Report; 2001 Jul 28; 23(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 12774775 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Factors involved in young people's decisions about their health care. Gormley-Fleming L, Campbell A. Nurs Child Young People; 2011 Nov 28; 23(9):19-22. PubMed ID: 22164592 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Parental notice and consent for abortion: out of step with family law principles and policies. Greenberger MD, Connor K. Fam Plann Perspect; 1991 Nov 28; 23(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 2029941 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA. New Engl Law Rev; 1992 Nov 28; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Law, ethics, and abortion. Bayer R. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Aug 28; 2(4):564-9. PubMed ID: 2130954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Nontherapeutic research with children: the virtues and vices of legal uncertainty. Smolin DM. Cumberland Law Rev; 1990 Aug 28; 33(3):621-45. PubMed ID: 15378825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [The origin of informed consent]. Mallardi V. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct 28; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Missouri's parental consent law and teen pregnancy outcomes. Pierson VH. Women Health; 1995 Oct 28; 22(3):47-58. PubMed ID: 7638977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research. Rubinstein E. Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003 Oct 28; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Decision-making authority and substance abuse treatment for adolescents: a survey of state laws. Lallemont T, Mastroianni A, Wickizer TM. J Adolesc Health; 2009 Apr 28; 44(4):323-34. PubMed ID: 19306790 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The mature minor: some critical psychological reflections on the empirical bases. Partridge BC. J Med Philos; 2013 Jun 28; 38(3):283-99. PubMed ID: 23615057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Baby doe redux? The Department of Health and Human Services and the Born-Alive Infants Protection Act of 2002: a cautionary note on normative neonatal practice. Sayeed SA. Pediatrics; 2005 Oct 28; 116(4):e576-85. PubMed ID: 16199687 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]