These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

157 related items for PubMed ID: 23543639

  • 1. A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair.
    Bharathi A, Reddy DB, Kote GS.
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2013 Feb; 7(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 23543639
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 2. A randomised comparison of polyglactin 910 with chromic catgut for postpartum perineal repair.
    Mackrodt C, Gordon B, Fern E, Ayers S, Truesdale A, Grant A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr; 105(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9609273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A randomised trial, conducted by midwives, of perineal repairs comparing a polyglycolic suture material and chromic catgut.
    Upton A, Roberts CL, Ryan M, Faulkner M, Reynolds M, Raynes-Greenow C.
    Midwifery; 2002 Sep; 18(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 12381426
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Absorbable suture materials for primary repair of episiotomy and second degree tears.
    Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2010 Jun 16; 2010(6):CD000006. PubMed ID: 20556745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Absorbable synthetic versus catgut suture material for perineal repair.
    Kettle C, Johanson RB.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2000 Jun 16; (2):CD000006. PubMed ID: 10796081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial.
    Leroux N, Bujold E.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jun 16; 194(6):1585-90; discussion 1590. PubMed ID: 16731075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured.
    Kindberg S, Stehouwer M, Hvidman L, Henriksen TB.
    BJOG; 2008 Mar 16; 115(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 18271883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Episiotomy repair: chromic versus polyglycolic acid suture.
    Ketcham KR, Pastorek JG, Letellier RL.
    South Med J; 1994 Apr 16; 87(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 8153782
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A randomized comparison of glycerol-impregnated chromic catgut with untreated chromic catgut for the repair of perineal trauma.
    Spencer JA, Grant A, Elbourne D, Garcia J, Sleep J.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 May 16; 93(5):426-30. PubMed ID: 3518787
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Secondary suturing compared to non-suturing for broken down perineal wounds following childbirth.
    Dudley LM, Kettle C, Ismail KM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep 25; (9):CD008977. PubMed ID: 24065561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Episiotomy repair: Vicryl versus Vicryl rapide.
    McElhinney BR, Glenn DR, Dornan G, Harper MA.
    Ulster Med J; 2000 May 25; 69(1):27-9. PubMed ID: 10881642
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The MOVE-trial: Monocryl® vs. Vicryl Rapide™ for skin repair in mediolateral episiotomies: a randomized controlled trial.
    Odijk R, Hennipman B, Rousian M, Madani K, Dijksterhuis M, de Leeuw JW, van Hof A.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct 16; 17(1):355. PubMed ID: 29037181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Ipswich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.
    Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayers S, Grant A.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Apr 16; 105(4):435-40. PubMed ID: 9609272
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair.
    Grant A, Gordon B, Mackrodat C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayers S.
    BJOG; 2001 Jan 16; 108(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 11213002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears.
    Kettle C, Hills RK, Ismail KM.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Oct 17; (4):CD000947. PubMed ID: 17943747
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A Randomized, Single-Blind Study Comparing the Clinical Equivalence of Truglyde Fast® and Safil Quick® Polyglycolic Acid Fast-Absorbing Sutures for Episiotomy Repair Following Vaginal Delivery.
    Nk R, Devgarha G, Subha Shree Rao YA, N R, Moharana AK, Ts D.
    Cureus; 2023 Jul 17; 15(7):e42348. PubMed ID: 37621806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Southmead perineal suture study. A randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma.
    Mahomed K, Grant A, Ashurst H, James D.
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1989 Nov 17; 96(11):1272-80. PubMed ID: 2558705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.