These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 2354932

  • 1. Cytogenic effects of diatrizoate and ioxaglate on patients undergoing excretory urography.
    Nuñez ME, Sinués B.
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Jun; 25(6):692-7. PubMed ID: 2354932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Micronucleus assay in biomonitoring of patients undergoing excretory urography with diatrizoate and ioxaglate.
    Sinúes B, Nuñez E, Bernal ML, Alcala A, Saenz MA, Conde B.
    Mutat Res; 1991 Aug; 260(4):337-42. PubMed ID: 1870623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Pain during angiography: a randomized double-blind trial comparing ioxaglate and diatrizoate.
    Pathria M, Somers S, Gill G.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1987 Mar; 38(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 2953734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Plasma histamine levels following administration of radiographic contrast media.
    Robertson PW, Frewin DB, Robertson AR, Mahar LJ, Jonsson JR.
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Nov; 58(695):1047-51. PubMed ID: 3842611
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adverse reactions during intravenous urography: are these due to histamine release?
    Herd CM, Robertson AR, Frewin DB, Taylor WB.
    Br J Radiol; 1988 Jan; 61(721):5-11. PubMed ID: 2450612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Double-blind comparison of iodamide and diatrizoate for excretory urography.
    Rosenfield AT, Putman CE, Ulreich S, Koss N.
    Yale J Biol Med; 1977 Jan; 50(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 345632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A randomised, prospective study comparing two contrast media in ERCP.
    Cunliffe WJ, Cobden I, Lavelle MI, Lendrum R, Tait NP, Venables CW.
    Endoscopy; 1987 Sep; 19(5):201-2. PubMed ID: 3678161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Double-blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 for excretory urography.
    Gerzof SG, Robbins AH, Unger G, Zaki A, Wickis EA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Feb; 128(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 401604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hemodynamic changes induced by cardiac angiography with ioxaglate: comparison with diatrizoate.
    Hirshfeld JW, Laskey W, Martin JL, Groh WC, Untereker W, Wolf GL.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Nov; 2(5):954-7. PubMed ID: 6630771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Experimental pancreatography: a comparison of three contrast media.
    Saari A, Kivisaari L, Standertskjöld-Nordenstam CG, Brackett K, Schröder T.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1988 Jan; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3344398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical intravenous urography: comparative trial of ioxaglate and iopamidol.
    Loughran CF.
    Radiology; 1986 Nov; 161(2):455-8. PubMed ID: 3763918
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.