These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
223 related items for PubMed ID: 23556603
1. Detection of shouted speech in noise: human and machine. Pohjalainen J, Raitio T, Yrttiaho S, Alku P. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2377-89. PubMed ID: 23556603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing. Jørgensen S, Dau T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences. Stilp CE. J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The relative importance of spectral cues for vowel recognition in severe noise. Swanepoel R, Oosthuizen DJ, Hanekom JJ. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2652-62. PubMed ID: 23039458 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of binaural spectral resolution mismatch on Mandarin speech perception in simulated electric hearing. Chen F, Wong LL, Tahmina Q, Azimi B, Hu Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):EL142-8. PubMed ID: 22894313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of noise envelope modulation on quality judgments of noisy speech. Jin IK, Kates JM, Arehart KH. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):EL277-83. PubMed ID: 23039565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test. Cameron S, Dillon H, Newall P. Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech. Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise. Liu C, Jin SH. Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm. Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefit of temporal fine structure to speech perception in noise measured with controlled temporal envelopes. Eaves JM, Summerfield AQ, Kitterick PT. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):501-7. PubMed ID: 21786915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise tolerance in human frequency-following responses to voice pitch. Li X, Jeng FC. J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):EL21-6. PubMed ID: 21302977 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of low harmonics on tone identification in natural and vocoded speech. Liu C, Azimi B, Tahmina Q, Hu Y. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Nov; 132(5):EL378-84. PubMed ID: 23145698 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. On the perception of speech in primary school classrooms: ranking of noise interference and of age influence. Prodi N, Visentin C, Feletti A. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):255-68. PubMed ID: 23297900 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]