These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 23556604

  • 1. Recognition of speech in noise after application of time-frequency masks: dependence on frequency and threshold parameters.
    Sinex DG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2390-6. PubMed ID: 23556604
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Perceptual learning for speech in noise after application of binary time-frequency masks.
    Ahmadi M, Gross VL, Sinex DG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1687-92. PubMed ID: 23464038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. An algorithm to improve speech recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Healy EW, Yoho SE, Wang Y, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):3029-38. PubMed ID: 24116438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Intelligibility of reverberant noisy speech with ideal binary masking.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2153-61. PubMed ID: 21973369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Adaptation to Noise in Spectrotemporal Modulation Detection and Word Recognition.
    López-Ramos D, Marrufo-Pérez MI, Eustaquio-Martín A, López-Bascuas LE, Lopez-Poveda EA.
    Trends Hear; 2024 Oct; 28():23312165241266322. PubMed ID: 39267369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity for hearing-impaired listeners: dependence on carrier center frequency and the relationship to speech intelligibility.
    Mehraei G, Gallun FJ, Leek MR, Bernstein JG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jul; 136(1):301-16. PubMed ID: 24993215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N, Furst M, Muchnik C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. The Influence of Noise Reduction on Speech Intelligibility, Response Times to Speech, and Perceived Listening Effort in Normal-Hearing Listeners.
    van den Tillaart-Haverkate M, de Ronde-Brons I, Dreschler WA, Houben R.
    Trends Hear; 2017 Aug; 21():2331216517716844. PubMed ID: 28656807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Perceptual effects of noise reduction by time-frequency masking of noisy speech.
    Brons I, Houben R, Dreschler WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2690-9. PubMed ID: 23039461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses.
    Koning R, Wouters J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2569-81. PubMed ID: 23039450
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test.
    Zokoll MA, Fidan D, Türkyılmaz D, Hochmuth S, Ergenç İ, Sennaroğlu G, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Oct; 54 Suppl 2():51-61. PubMed ID: 26443486
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Role and relative contribution of temporal envelope and fine structure cues in sentence recognition by normal-hearing listeners.
    Apoux F, Yoho SE, Youngdahl CL, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Sep; 134(3):2205-12. PubMed ID: 23967950
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise.
    Puglisi GE, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, Visentin C, Astolfi A, Prodi N, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54 Suppl 2():44-50. PubMed ID: 26371592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of fluctuating maskers for speech recognition tests.
    Francart T, van Wieringen A, Wouters J.
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 21091261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.