These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 23556604

  • 21. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
    Carroll J, Tiaden S, Zeng FG.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The interpretation of speech reception threshold data in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: II. Fluctuating noise.
    Smits C, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3004-15. PubMed ID: 23654404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. The role of binary mask patterns in automatic speech recognition in background noise.
    Narayanan A, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):3083-93. PubMed ID: 23654411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment.
    D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD.
    Trends Hear; 2017 May; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J, Wang Y, Yoho SE, Wang D, Healy EW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Role of mask pattern in intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech.
    Kjems U, Boldt JB, Pedersen MS, Lunner T, Wang D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1415-26. PubMed ID: 19739755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The relative importance of consonant and vowel segments to the recognition of words and sentences: effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D, Kewley-Port D, Humes LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1667-78. PubMed ID: 22978895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Auditory models of suprathreshold distortion and speech intelligibility in persons with impaired hearing.
    Bernstein JG, Summers V, Grassi E, Grant KW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):307-28. PubMed ID: 23636211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The effects of the addition of low-level, low-noise noise on the intelligibility of sentences processed to remove temporal envelope information.
    Hopkins K, Moore BC, Stone MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Oct; 128(4):2150-61. PubMed ID: 20968385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.
    Jørgensen S, Dau T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1475-87. PubMed ID: 21895088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.
    Fogerty D.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):489-500. PubMed ID: 21786914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. An algorithm that improves speech intelligibility in noise for normal-hearing listeners.
    Kim G, Lu Y, Hu Y, Loizou PC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1486-94. PubMed ID: 19739761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.
    Başkent D, van Engelshoven S, Galvin JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL147-53. PubMed ID: 24606308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Frequency specificity of amplitude envelope patterns in noise-vocoded speech.
    Ueda K, Araki T, Nakajima Y.
    Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():169-181. PubMed ID: 29929750
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test.
    Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, Ozimek E, Boboshko M, Kollmeier B.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Sep; 54 Suppl 2():35-43. PubMed ID: 25843088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians.
    Meha-Bettison K, Sharma M, Ibrahim RK, Mandikal Vasuki PR.
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jan; 57(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 28971719
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Speech reception with different bilateral directional processing schemes: Influence of binaural hearing, audiometric asymmetry, and acoustic scenario.
    Neher T, Wagener KC, Latzel M.
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():36-48. PubMed ID: 28783570
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: effect of masker type.
    Deroche ML, Culling JF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL465-70. PubMed ID: 24181992
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. A Danish open-set speech corpus for competing-speech studies.
    Nielsen JB, Dau T, Neher T.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):407-20. PubMed ID: 24437781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Speech intelligibility in reverberation with ideal binary masking: effects of early reflections and signal-to-noise ratio threshold.
    Roman N, Woodruff J.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Mar; 133(3):1707-17. PubMed ID: 23464040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.