These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Considerations on Adaptive Gain and Frequency Response in Hearing Aids. Festen JM, Van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R. Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):196-201. PubMed ID: 31905511 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope. Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement. DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf. Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Oct; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects. Brey RH, Robinette MS, Chabries DM, Christiansen RW. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Oct; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived speech quality. Arehart KH, Kates JM, Anderson MC. Ear Hear; 2010 Jun; 31(3):420-36. PubMed ID: 20440116 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. Simpson AM, Moore BC, Glasberg BR. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Jun; 469():101-7. PubMed ID: 2356717 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Binaural noise-reduction hearing aid scheme with real-time processing in the frequency domain. Kollmeier B, Peissig J, Hohmann V. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Apr; 38():28-38. PubMed ID: 8153562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing. Strelcyk O, Dau T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Speech intelligibility considerations in specifying characteristics of a programmable hearing aid. Pavlovic CV. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 May; 469():181-9. PubMed ID: 2356725 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term effects of non-linear frequency compression for children with moderate hearing loss. Wolfe J, John A, Schafer E, Nyffeler M, Boretzki M, Caraway T, Hudson M. Int J Audiol; 2011 Jun; 50(6):396-404. PubMed ID: 21599615 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design. Plomp R. Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech quality evaluation of a sparse coding shrinkage noise reduction algorithm with normal hearing and hearing impaired listeners. Sang J, Hu H, Zheng C, Li G, Lutman ME, Bleeck S. Hear Res; 2015 Sep; 327():175-85. PubMed ID: 26232529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]