These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
160 related items for PubMed ID: 2356737
1. On the limited transfer of information with noise-induced hearing loss. Smoorenburg GF. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():38-46. PubMed ID: 2356737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. On the Limited Transfer of Information with Noise-induced Hearing Loss. Smoorenburg GF. Acta Otolaryngol; 1990; 109(sup469):38-46. PubMed ID: 31905510 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech. Dubno JR, Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB. Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response. Horwitz AR, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise]. Tremblay C, Picard M, Barbarosie T, Banville R. Audiology; 1991 Sep; 30(4):212-40. PubMed ID: 1755750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of disturbing noise on sentence intelligibility (author's transl)]. Welzl-Müller K. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Mar; 60(3):117-20. PubMed ID: 7230993 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test. Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA. Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Feb; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing. Arlinger S, Dryselius H. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990 Feb; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Recognition of digits in different types of noise by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Smits C, Houtgast T. Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):134-44. PubMed ID: 17365067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of the intelligibility for speech in real-life background noises for subjects with normal hearing. Rhebergen KS, Versfeld NJ, Dreschler WA. Ear Hear; 2008 Apr; 29(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18490862 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in a group of professional singers who have normal pure-tone hearing thresholds. Hamdan AL, Abouchacra KS, Zeki Al Hazzouri AG, Zaytoun G. Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):360-77. PubMed ID: 18382377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope. Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking. Wang D, Kjems U, Pedersen MS, Boldt JB, Lunner T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Speech tests: application in individuals with noise induced hearing loss]. Moreira RR, Ferreira Junior M. Pro Fono; 2004 Apr; 16(3):293-300. PubMed ID: 15609584 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]