These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

146 related items for PubMed ID: 23568338

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Evaluation of the microangiographic fluoroscope (MAF) using generalized system performance metrics.
    Jain A, Bednarek DR, Rudin S.
    Med Phys; 2013 Mar; 40(3):031915. PubMed ID: 23464330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Effect on image data resampling in evaluation of the basic imaging properties for a digital radiographic system based on a flat panel detector].
    Katayama R, Sakai S, Morishita J, Sakaguchi T, Ohkubo S, Maeda T, Takada K, Hayabuchi N.
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul 20; 63(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 17917336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ, Samei E.
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr 20; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.
    Padgett R, Kotre CJ.
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar 21; 49(6):977-86. PubMed ID: 15104320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Comparison of different commercial FFDM units by means of physical characterization and contrast-detail analysis.
    Rivetti S, Lanconelli N, Campanini R, Bertolini M, Borasi G, Nitrosi A, Danielli C, Angelini L, Maggi S.
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov 21; 33(11):4198-209. PubMed ID: 17153399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Visualization of blurring process due to analog components in a digital radiography system using a simple method.
    Maruyama S.
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2020 Dec 21; 43(4):1461-1468. PubMed ID: 33151466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of image lag in a flat-panel, detector-equipped cardiovascular X-ray machine using a newly developed dynamic phantom.
    Sato H, Kondo K, Kato K, Nakazawa Y.
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Mar 08; 16(2):5213. PubMed ID: 26103192
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Digital radiology using active matrix readout of amorphous selenium: theoretical analysis of detective quantum efficiency.
    Zhao W, Rowlands JA.
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec 08; 24(12):1819-33. PubMed ID: 9434965
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.