These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
239 related items for PubMed ID: 2357464
1. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 2--Dentoalveolar changes. Derringer K. Br J Orthod; 1990 May; 17(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 2357464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Cangialosi TJ, Meistrell ME, Leung MA, Ko JY. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An assessment of Andresen therapy on class II division 1 malocclusion. Calvert FJ. Br J Orthod; 1982 Jul; 9(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6954989 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Yao CC, Lai EH, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):615-24. PubMed ID: 18984393 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1--Skeletal changes. Derringer K. Br J Orthod; 1990 Feb; 17(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 2310738 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance. Valant JR, Sinclair PM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1989 Feb; 95(2):138-47. PubMed ID: 2916470 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Heavy intermittent cervical traction in class II treatment: a longitudinal cephalometric assessment. Mills CM, Holman RG, Graber TM. Am J Orthod; 1978 Oct; 74(4):361-79. PubMed ID: 281139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes. Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Kawaguchi M, Shibata M, Goto S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Distal movement without headgear: the use of an upper removable appliance for the retraction of upper first molars. Lewis DH, Fox NA. Br J Orthod; 1996 Nov; 23(4):305-12. PubMed ID: 8985566 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative analysis of the orthodontic and orthopedic effects of maxillary traction. Baumrind S, Korn EL, Isaacson RJ, West EE, Molthen R. Am J Orthod; 1983 Nov; 84(5):384-98. PubMed ID: 6579840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible? Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S. Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances. Martins RP, da Rosa Martins JC, Martins LP, Buschang PH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary traction splint: a cephalometric evaluation. Caldwell SF, Hymas TA, Timm TA. Am J Orthod; 1984 May; 85(5):376-84. PubMed ID: 6586076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of timing on the outcomes of 1-phase nonextraction therapy of Class II malocclusion. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Kim LH. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 19815151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]