These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

840 related items for PubMed ID: 23586660

  • 1. The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma.
    Nurkin S, Kakarla VR, Ruiz DE, Cance WG, Tiszenkel HI.
    Colorectal Dis; 2013 Jun; 15(6):e309-16. PubMed ID: 23586660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis.
    Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C, Guiguet M, Tiret E, Parc R.
    Br J Surg; 1998 Aug; 85(8):1114-7. PubMed ID: 9718009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Transumbilical defunctioning ileostomy: A new approach for patients at risks of anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection.
    Eto K, Omura N, Haruki K, Uno Y, Ohkuma M, Nakajima S, Anan T, Kosuge M, Fujita T, Ishida K, Yanaga K.
    Anticancer Res; 2013 Nov; 33(11):5011-5. PubMed ID: 24222144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Redo coloanal anastomosis for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: an analysis of 59 cases.
    Westerduin E, Borstlap WAA, Musters GD, Westerterp M, van Geloven AAW, Tanis PJ, Wolthuis AM, Bemelman WA, D'Hoore A.
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Jan; 20(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 28795776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Delayed transanal repair of persistent coloanal anastomotic leak in diverted patients after resection for rectal cancer.
    Blumetti J, Chaudhry V, Prasad L, Abcarian H.
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1238-41. PubMed ID: 22229958
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Defunctioning loop ileostomy with low anterior resection for distal rectal cancer: should we make an ileostomy as a routine procedure? A prospective randomized study.
    Chude GG, Rayate NV, Patris V, Koshariya M, Jagad R, Kawamoto J, Lygidakis NJ.
    Hepatogastroenterology; 2008 Oct; 55(86-87):1562-7. PubMed ID: 19102343
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Postoperative and long-term outcomes after redo surgery for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomosis: retrospective analysis of 50 patients and review of the literature.
    Genser L, Manceau G, Karoui M, Breton S, Brevart C, Rousseau G, Vaillant JC, Hannoun L.
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Jun; 56(6):747-55. PubMed ID: 23652749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Robotic coloanal anastomosis with or without intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: starting with the perianal approach followed by robotic procedure.
    Kang J, Hur H, Min BS, Lee KY, Kim NK.
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jan; 19(1):154-5. PubMed ID: 21822556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. High complication rate after low anterior resection for mid and high rectal cancer; results of a population-based study.
    Bakker IS, Snijders HS, Wouters MW, Havenga K, Tollenaar RA, Wiggers T, Dekker JW.
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jun; 40(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 24655803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 42.