These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

137 related items for PubMed ID: 2358916

  • 1. Vibroacoustic stimulation and fetal heart rate in nonstress tests.
    Sleutel MR.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1990; 19(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2358916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vibroacoustic stimulation and nursing intervention in the nonstress test.
    Auyeung RM, Goldkrand JW.
    J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs; 1991; 20(3):232-8. PubMed ID: 2056360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Antepartum vibroacoustic stimulation in patients with low fetal heart rate variability.
    Bartnicki J, Dudenhausen JW.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1995 Feb; 48(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 7789591
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fetal vibroacoustic stimulation for facilitation of tests of fetal wellbeing.
    Tan KH, Smyth RM, Wei X.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Dec 07; 2013(12):CD002963. PubMed ID: 24318543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Computerized cardiotocography following vibroacoustic stimulation of premature fetuses.
    Bartnicki J, Dimer JA, Hertwig K, Dudenhausen JW.
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1998 Dec 07; 45(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 9517795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Nonstress testing at ≤ 32.0 weeks' gestation: a randomized trial comparing different assessment criteria.
    Cousins LM, Poeltler DM, Faron S, Catanzarite V, Daneshmand S, Casele H.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct 07; 207(4):311.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23021694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Bolnick JM, Garcia G, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2006 Apr 07; 19(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 16854694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of the acoustic stimulation test with nonstress test. A randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Tongsong T, Piyamongkol W.
    J Reprod Med; 1994 Jan 07; 39(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 8169910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Position of the vibroacoustic stimulator does not affect fetal response.
    Eller DP, Robinson LJ, Newman RB.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Oct 07; 167(4 Pt 1):1137-9. PubMed ID: 1415406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of labor analgesia with nalbuphine hydrochloride on fetal response to vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Poehlmann S, Pinette M, Stubblefield P.
    J Reprod Med; 1995 Oct 07; 40(10):707-10. PubMed ID: 8551472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Fetal responses to different intensity levels of vibroacoustic stimulation.
    Yao QW, Jakobsson J, Nyman M, Rabaeus H, Till O, Westgren M.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb 07; 75(2):206-9. PubMed ID: 2300347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.