These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
429 related items for PubMed ID: 23595060
1. Comparison of MM/GBSA calculations based on explicit and implicit solvent simulations. Godschalk F, Genheden S, Söderhjelm P, Ryde U. Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2013 May 28; 15(20):7731-9. PubMed ID: 23595060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Accurate predictions of nonpolar solvation free energies require explicit consideration of binding-site hydration. Genheden S, Mikulskis P, Hu L, Kongsted J, Söderhjelm P, Ryde U. J Am Chem Soc; 2011 Aug 24; 133(33):13081-92. PubMed ID: 21728337 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling loop reorganization free energies of acetylcholinesterase: a comparison of explicit and implicit solvent models. Olson MA. Proteins; 2004 Dec 01; 57(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 15481087 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Discrimination between native and intentionally misfolded conformations of proteins: ES/IS, a new method for calculating conformational free energy that uses both dynamics simulations with an explicit solvent and an implicit solvent continuum model. Vorobjev YN, Almagro JC, Hermans J. Proteins; 1998 Sep 01; 32(4):399-413. PubMed ID: 9726412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Continuum solvation models in the linear interaction energy method. Carlsson J, Andér M, Nervall M, Aqvist J. J Phys Chem B; 2006 Jun 22; 110(24):12034-41. PubMed ID: 16800513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies. Genheden S, Ryde U. Proteins; 2012 May 22; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Computations of Absolute Solvation Free Energies of Small Molecules Using Explicit and Implicit Solvent Model. Shivakumar D, Deng Y, Roux B. J Chem Theory Comput; 2009 Apr 14; 5(4):919-30. PubMed ID: 26609601 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. An MM/3D-RISM approach for ligand binding affinities. Genheden S, Luchko T, Gusarov S, Kovalenko A, Ryde U. J Phys Chem B; 2010 Jul 01; 114(25):8505-16. PubMed ID: 20524650 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the solvent representation on vibrational entropy calculations: generalized born versus distance-dependent dielectric model. Kopitz H, Cashman DA, Pfeiffer-Marek S, Gohlke H. J Comput Chem; 2012 Apr 05; 33(9):1004-13. PubMed ID: 22298332 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The normal-mode entropy in the MM/GBSA method: effect of system truncation, buffer region, and dielectric constant. Genheden S, Kuhn O, Mikulskis P, Hoffmann D, Ryde U. J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Aug 27; 52(8):2079-88. PubMed ID: 22817270 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Develop and test a solvent accessible surface area-based model in conformational entropy calculations. Wang J, Hou T. J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May 25; 52(5):1199-212. PubMed ID: 22497310 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]