These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


93 related items for PubMed ID: 2359557

  • 1. Comparison of chemiluminescent DNA probe to cell culture for the screening of Chlamydia trachomatis in a gynecology clinic population.
    Mercer LJ, Robinson DC, Sahm DF, Lawrie MJ, Hajj SN.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):114-7. PubMed ID: 2359557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine samples by polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay.
    Ngeow YF, Hema V, Zakaria M, Lee CH, Ramachandran S.
    Malays J Pathol; 1997 Dec; 19(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 10879253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Chlamydia trachomatis detection by DNA-RNA hybridization].
    Torres MJ, Cano RJ, Rodríguez A, Palomares JC.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1992 Mar; 10(3):152-4. PubMed ID: 1576189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis by PCR in genitourinary specimens from men and women attending an STD clinic.
    Bhalla P, Baveja UK, Chawla R, Saini S, Khaki P, Bhalla K, Mahajan S, Reddy BS.
    J Commun Dis; 2007 Mar; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18338709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Nucleic acid hybridization for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Comparison of a radioactive with a non-radioactive procedure].
    Näher H, Niebauer B, Hartmann M, Söltz-Szöts J, Petzoldt D.
    Hautarzt; 1990 Mar; 41(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 1693139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of diagnostic methods in adolescent girls with and without symptoms of Chlamydia urogenital infection.
    Biro FM, Reising SF, Doughman JA, Kollar LM, Rosenthal SL.
    Pediatrics; 1994 Mar; 93(3):476-80. PubMed ID: 8115208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections.
    Monno R, De Vito D, Vena GA, Mosca A, Miragliotta G.
    Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Urine-based testing for Chlamydia trachomatis using polymerase chain reaction, leucocyte esterase and urethral and cervical smears.
    Coble BI, Nordahl-Akesson E, Vinnerberg A, Kihlström E.
    Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006 Oct; 66(4):269-77. PubMed ID: 16777755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A comparison of rapid enzyme immunoassay tests for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis cervical infections.
    Ferris DG, Martin WH, Fischer PM, Petry LJ.
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Dec; 31(6):597-601. PubMed ID: 2246633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Direct fluorescent antibody testing for endocervical Chlamydia trachomatis: factors affecting accuracy.
    Livengood CH, Schmitt JW, Addison WA, Wrenn JW, Magruder-Habib K.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Nov; 72(5):803-9. PubMed ID: 3050655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between the LCx Probe system and the COBAS AMPLICOR system for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in patients attending a clinic for treatment of sexually transmitted diseases in Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
    van Doornum GJ, Schouls LM, Pijl A, Cairo I, Buimer M, Bruisten S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2001 Mar; 39(3):829-35. PubMed ID: 11230391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparison of immunofluorescence, enzyme immunoassay and cell culture for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital infections].
    Martínez A, Pinto E, Gaggero A, Arroyave R.
    Rev Med Chil; 1991 Feb; 119(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 1824159
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Improvement of cervical Chlamydia detection in asymptomatic family planning attendees by using Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis assay.
    Chout R, Vaton S, Quist D, Bucher R, Leguyader-Desprees P, Sayada C.
    Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 1995 Jul; 41(5):731-6. PubMed ID: 7580853
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of an enzyme immunoassay (IDEIA) with tissue culture isolation for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis using a single swab.
    Krech T, Gerhard-Fsadni D, Degen KW, Vossel R, Géraud GP.
    Microbiologica; 1989 Apr; 12(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 2664432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and culture techniques for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Tabrizi SN, Lees MI, Garland SM.
    Mol Cell Probes; 1993 Oct; 7(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 8264669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis from the cervix.
    Amortegui AJ, Meyer MP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Apr; 65(4):523-6. PubMed ID: 3885103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. A rapid chemiluminescent DNA hybridization assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis.
    Clyne JM, Running JA, Stempien M, Stephens RS, Akhavan-Tafti H, Schaap AP, Urdea MS.
    J Biolumin Chemilumin; 1989 Jul; 4(1):357-66. PubMed ID: 2508437
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. DNA sequencing validation of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid tests.
    Lee SH, Vigliotti VS, Pappu S.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2008 Jun; 129(6):852-9. PubMed ID: 18480000
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.