These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas by pyrite-modified fly ash adsorbent. Qi L, Wang X, Wang W, Li J, Huang Y. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Jun; 29(26):39228-39238. PubMed ID: 35099696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Possibilities of mercury removal in the dry flue gas cleaning lines of solid waste incineration units. Svoboda K, Hartman M, Šyc M, Pohořelý M, Kameníková P, Jeremiáš M, Durda T. J Environ Manage; 2016 Jan 15; 166():499-511. PubMed ID: 26588812 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Using bromine gas to enhance mercury removal from flue gas of coal-fired power plants. Liu SH, Yan NQ, Liu ZR, Qu Z, Wang HP, Chang SG, Miller C. Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Feb 15; 41(4):1405-12. PubMed ID: 17593749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Distribution of mercury in the combustion products from coal-fired power plants in Guizhou, southwest China. Liu S, Chen J, Cao Y, Yang H, Chen C, Jia W. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Feb 15; 69(2):234-245. PubMed ID: 30396327 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Mercury oxidation promoted by a selective catalytic reduction catalyst under simulated Powder River Basin coal combustion conditions. Lee CW, Serre SD, Zhao Y, Lee SJ, Hastings TW. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2008 Apr 15; 58(4):484-93. PubMed ID: 18422035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of Nano-Sulfide Sorbent for Efficient Removal of Elemental Mercury from Coal Combustion Fuel Gas. Li H, Zhu L, Wang J, Li L, Shih K. Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Sep 06; 50(17):9551-7. PubMed ID: 27508312 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface compositions of carbon sorbents exposed to simulated low-rank coal flue gases. Olson ES, Crocker CR, Benson SA, Pavlish JH, Holmes MJ. J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2005 Jun 06; 55(6):747-54. PubMed ID: 16022412 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hg0 removal from flue gas over different zeolites modified by FeCl3. Qi H, Xu W, Wang J, Tong L, Zhu T. J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Feb 01; 28():110-7. PubMed ID: 25662245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The secondary release of mercury in coal fly ash-based flue-gas mercury removal technology. He J, Duan C, Lei M, Zhu X. Environ Technol; 2016 Feb 01; 37(1):28-38. PubMed ID: 26121324 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The performance of iodine on the removal of elemental mercury from the simulated coal-fired flue gas. Chi Y, Yan N, Qu Z, Qiao S, Jia J. J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul 30; 166(2-3):776-81. PubMed ID: 19153004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gaseous elemental mercury capture from flue gas using magnetic nanosized (Fe3-xMnx)1-δO4. Yang S, Yan N, Guo Y, Wu D, He H, Qu Z, Li J, Zhou Q, Jia J. Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Feb 15; 45(4):1540-6. PubMed ID: 21207939 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Stability of mercury on a novel mineral sulfide sorbent used for efficient mercury removal from coal combustion flue gas. Li H, Zhang M, Zhu L, Yang J. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Oct 15; 25(28):28583-28593. PubMed ID: 30091078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]