These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Mammographic predictors of the presence and size of invasive carcinomas associated with malignant microcalcification lesions without a mass. Stomper PC, Geradts J, Edge SB, Levine EG. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Dec; 181(6):1679-84. PubMed ID: 14627596 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathologic-radiologic correlations in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: findings of the Singapore breast screening project. Tan PH, Ho JT, Ng EH, Chiang GS, Low SC, Ng FC, Bay BH. Int J Cancer; 2000 Aug 20; 90(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 10993963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lesion size is a major determinant of the mammographic features of ductal carcinoma in situ: findings from the Sloane project. Evans A, Clements K, Maxwell A, Bishop H, Hanby A, Lawrence G, Pinder SE, Sloane Project Steering Group. Clin Radiol; 2010 Mar 20; 65(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 20152272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH, Kim SM, Jang M, Chang JM, Chung SY. Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul 20; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting invasion in mammographically detected microcalcification. Bagnall MJ, Evans AJ, Wilson AR, Pinder SE, Denley H, Geraghty JG, Ellis IO. Clin Radiol; 2001 Oct 20; 56(10):828-32. PubMed ID: 11895299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype. Stomper PC, Connolly JL. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep 20; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association Between BI-RADS Calcification Descriptors and Recurrence Risk as Assessed by the Oncotype DX Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Score. Woodard GA, Price ER. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Apr 20; 212(4):919-924. PubMed ID: 30714832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mammographic appearance of nonpalpable breast cancer reflects pathologic characteristics. Gajdos C, Tartter PI, Bleiweiss IJ, Hermann G, de Csepel J, Estabrook A, Rademaker AW. Ann Surg; 2002 Feb 20; 235(2):246-51. PubMed ID: 11807365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Patterns of aggressiveness: risk of progression to invasive breast cancer by mammographic features of calcifications in screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ. Lilleborge M, Falk RS, Hovda T, Holmen MM, Ursin G, Hofvind S. Acta Radiol; 2022 May 20; 63(5):586-595. PubMed ID: 33887963 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T, Tung TH, Chen LS, Chiu YH, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Cancer; 2004 Oct 15; 101(8):1745-59. PubMed ID: 15386334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic features predicting an extensive intraductal component in early-stage infiltrating ductal carcinoma. Stomper PC, Connolly JL. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb 15; 158(2):269-72. PubMed ID: 1309620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Is the upgrade rate of atypical ductal hyperplasia diagnosed by core needle biopsy of calcifications different for digital and film-screen mammography? McLaughlin CT, Neal CH, Helvie MA. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct 15; 203(4):917-22. PubMed ID: 25247961 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Holland R, Hendriks JH. Semin Diagn Pathol; 1994 Aug 15; 11(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7831529 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Mucocele-like lesions of the breast: a benign cause for indeterminate or suspicious mammographic microcalcifications. Farshid G, Pieterse S, King JM, Robinson J. Breast J; 2005 Aug 15; 11(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 15647073 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]