These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

314 related items for PubMed ID: 23600582

  • 1. Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration.
    Mageswaran P, McLain RF, Colbrunn R, Bonner T, Hothem E, Bartsch A.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun; 18(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23600582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct 15; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A, Ames CP, Chamberlain RH, Sonntag VK, Dickman CA, Crawford NR.
    Spine J; 2007 Oct 15; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
    Tong J, Ji W, Zhou R, Huang Z, Liu S, Zhu Q.
    Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun 15; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Kinetic analysis of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion supplemented with transarticular facet screws.
    Traynelis VC, Sherman J, Nottmeier E, Singh V, McGilvray K, Puttlitz CM, Leahy PD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 May 15; 20(5):485-91. PubMed ID: 24559463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M, Eleraky M, Johnson WM, Aghayev K, Tran ND, Vrionis FD.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun 15; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Enhancement of stability following anterior cervical corpectomy: a biomechanical study.
    Singh K, Vaccaro AR, Kim J, Lorenz EP, Lim TH, An HS.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr 15; 29(8):845-9. PubMed ID: 15082982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Zero-profile hybrid fusion construct versus 2-level plate fixation to treat adjacent-level disease in the cervical spine.
    Healy AT, Sundar SJ, Cardenas RJ, Mageswaran P, Benzel EC, Mroz TE, Francis TB.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Nov 15; 21(5):753-60. PubMed ID: 25170655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Anterior cervical fixation: analysis of load-sharing and stability with use of static and dynamic plates.
    Brodke DS, Klimo P, Bachus KN, Braun JT, Dailey AT.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Jul 15; 88(7):1566-73. PubMed ID: 16818983
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S, Baek S, Sonntag VK, Crawford NR.
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct 15; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Does pedicle screw fixation of the subaxial cervical spine provide adequate stabilization in a multilevel vertebral body fracture model? An in vitro biomechanical study.
    Duff J, Hussain MM, Klocke N, Harris JA, Yandamuri SS, Bobinski L, Daniel RT, Bucklen BS.
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2018 Mar 15; 53():72-78. PubMed ID: 29455101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.
    Koller H, Schmoelz W, Zenner J, Auffarth A, Resch H, Hitzl W, Malekzadeh D, Ernstbrunner L, Blocher M, Mayer M.
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec 15; 24(12):2848-56. PubMed ID: 25612849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
    Huang P, Gupta MC, Sarigul-Klijn N, Hazelwood S.
    Spine J; 2006 Dec 15; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI, Nayak AN, Gaskins RB, Cabezas AF, Santoni BG, Castellvi AE.
    Spine J; 2014 Jan 15; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for distractive-flexion injury stage 3 of the cervical spine.
    Henriques T, Cunningham BW, McAfee PC, Olerud C.
    Ups J Med Sci; 2015 Jan 15; 120(3):198-206. PubMed ID: 25742755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. In vitro biomechanical comparison of transpedicular versus translaminar C-2 screw fixation in C2-3 instrumentation.
    Reddy C, Ingalhalikar AV, Channon S, Lim TH, Torner J, Hitchon PW.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Oct 15; 7(4):414-8. PubMed ID: 17933316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Kretzer RM, Hu N, Umekoji H, Sciubba DM, Jallo GI, McAfee PC, Tortolani PJ, Cunningham BW.
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct 15; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 16.