These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

120 related items for PubMed ID: 23614947

  • 21. Root surface alterations following manual and mechanical scaling: A comparative study.
    Maritato M, Orazi L, Laurito D, Formisano G, Serra E, Lollobrigida M, Molinari A, De Biase A.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 Nov; 16(4):553-558. PubMed ID: 29797806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Scanning electron microscope evaluation of wear of dental curettes during standardized root planing.
    Tal H, Panno JM, Vaidyanathan TK.
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):532-6. PubMed ID: 3897505
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study.
    Tsurumaki Jdo N, Souto BH, Oliveira GJ, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio Júnior E, Marcantonio RA.
    Braz Dent J; 2011 Sep; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Variability of sonic scaling tip movement.
    Shah S, Walmsley AD, Chapple IL, Lumley PJ.
    J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Nov; 21(10):705-9. PubMed ID: 7852616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Study of the influence of different instruments for removing dental deposits on tooth surface].
    Kuchumova ED, Stiuf IaV.
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2006 Nov; 85(6):27-30. PubMed ID: 17310945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Scanning electron microscope study of scalers.
    Antonini CJ, Brady JM, Levin MP, Garcia WL.
    J Periodontol; 1977 Jan; 48(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 264541
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparison of the effects of four different power scalers on enamel tooth surface in the dog.
    Brine EJ, Marretta SM, Pijanowski GJ, Siegel AM.
    J Vet Dent; 2000 Mar; 17(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11968928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Molar furcation entrance and its relation to the width of curette blades used in periodontal mechanical therapy.
    dos Santos KM, Pinto SC, Pochapski MT, Wambier DS, Pilatti GL, Santos FA.
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2009 Nov; 7(4):263-9. PubMed ID: 19832913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. The comparative effect of ultrasonic scalers on titanium surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K.
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1269-73. PubMed ID: 15515344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Surface alterations of several dental materials by a novel ultrasonic scaler tip.
    Seol HW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Baek SH, Lee SY.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Sep; 27(4):801-10. PubMed ID: 22848881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. An In Vitro Evaluation of Alumina, Zirconia, and Lithium Disilicate Surface Roughness Caused by Two Scaling Instruments.
    Vigolo P, Buzzo O, Buzzo M, Mutinelli S.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Feb; 26(2):129-135. PubMed ID: 26683122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Clinical attachment loss produced by curettes and ultrasonic scalers.
    Alves RV, Machion L, Casati MZ, Nociti FH, Sallum EA, Sallum AW.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 32(7):691-4. PubMed ID: 15966872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Evaluation of the safety and efficiency of novel metallic ultrasonic scaler tip on titanium surfaces.
    Baek SH, Shon WJ, Bae KS, Kum KY, Lee WC, Park YS.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Nov; 23(11):1269-74. PubMed ID: 22093039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H, Sato S, Kishida M, Ito K.
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. [In vitro effects on rough implant surfaces of different instrumentations used in the surgical therapy of peri-implantitis].
    Espedito Di Lauro A, Morgese F, Squillace A, Ramaglia L.
    Minerva Stomatol; 2003 Feb; 52(1-2):1-7. PubMed ID: 12686908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study.
    Fox SC, Moriarty JD, Kusy RP.
    J Periodontol; 1990 Aug; 61(8):485-90. PubMed ID: 2202807
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. The diamond-coated sonic scaler tip. Part II: Loss of substance and alteration of root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Kocher T, Plagmann HC.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1997 Oct; 17(5):484-93. PubMed ID: 9497737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Subgingival polishing with a teflon-coated sonic scaler insert in comparison to conventional instruments as assessed on extracted teeth. (I) Residual deposits.
    Kocher T, Langenbeck M, Rühling A, Plagmann HC.
    J Clin Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 27(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 10783837
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. In Vitro Evaluation of the Effect of Chemical and Thermal Stress of the Mechanical Properties of Periodontal Curettes under Simulated Conditions of Sharpening Wear.
    De Pedro D, Puglisi R, Levi P, Pascual A, Nart J.
    Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017 Apr; 15(4):379-384. PubMed ID: 28748235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cell Attachment Following Instrumentation with Titanium and Plastic Instruments, Diode Laser, and Titanium Brush on Titanium, Titanium-Zirconium, and Zirconia Surfaces.
    Lang MS, Cerutis DR, Miyamoto T, Nunn ME.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Apr; 31(4):799-806. PubMed ID: 27447145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.