These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
218 related items for PubMed ID: 23621140
1. Optical coherence tomography for evaluation of coronary stents in vivo. Nammas W, Ligthart JM, Karanasos A, Witberg KT, Regar E. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2013 May; 11(5):577-88. PubMed ID: 23621140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Optical coherence tomography: high resolution intravascular imaging to evaluate vascular healing after coronary stenting. Guagliumi G, Sirbu V. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Aug 01; 72(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18655155 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography at follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention: relationship between procedural dissections, stent strut malapposition and stent healing. Radu M, Jørgensen E, Kelbæk H, Helqvist S, Skovgaard L, Saunamäki K. EuroIntervention; 2011 Jul 01; 7(3):353-61. PubMed ID: 21729838 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary observations using optical coherence tomography to assess neointimal coverage of a metal stent in a porcine model. Mills JS, N'diaye CS, Yow E, Urtz M, Povsic TJ, Greenfield JC, Phillips HR. Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2009 Jul 01; 10(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 19815170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomised study using optical coherence tomography to assess endothelial coverage and neointimal proliferation at 6-months after implantation of a coronary everolimus-eluting stent compared with a bare metal stent postdilated with a paclitaxel-eluting balloon (OCTOPUS Trial): rationale, design and methods. Poerner TC, Otto S, Gassdorf J, Janiak F, Danzer C, Ferrari M, Figulla HR. EuroIntervention; 2011 May 01; 7 Suppl K():K93-9. PubMed ID: 22027737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of frequency-domain optical coherence tomography guidance for optimal coronary stent implantation in comparison with intravascular ultrasound guidance. Habara M, Nasu K, Terashima M, Kaneda H, Yokota D, Ko E, Ito T, Kurita T, Tanaka N, Kimura M, Ito T, Kinoshita Y, Tsuchikane E, Asakura K, Asakura Y, Katoh O, Suzuki T. Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Apr 01; 5(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 22456026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated detection of vessel lumen and stent struts in intravascular optical coherence tomography to evaluate stent apposition and neointimal coverage. Nam HS, Kim CS, Lee JJ, Song JW, Kim JW, Yoo H. Med Phys; 2016 Apr 01; 43(4):1662. PubMed ID: 27036565 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Optical coherence tomography to evaluate coronary stent implantation and complications. Hayat U, Thondapu V, Ul Haq MA, Foin N, Jang IK, Barlis P. Coron Artery Dis; 2015 Aug 01; 26 Suppl 1():e55-68. PubMed ID: 26247272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy and reproducibility of stent-strut thickness determined by optical coherence tomography. Terashima M, Rathore S, Suzuki Y, Nakayama Y, Kaneda H, Nasu K, Habara M, Katoh O, Suzuki T. J Invasive Cardiol; 2009 Nov 01; 21(11):602-5. PubMed ID: 19901417 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Current applications of optical coherence tomography for coronary intervention. Ferrante G, Presbitero P, Whitbourn R, Barlis P. Int J Cardiol; 2013 Apr 30; 165(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 22405134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical coherence tomography: clinical applications and the evaluation of DES. Gonzalo N, Serruys PW, Regar E. Minerva Cardioangiol; 2008 Oct 30; 56(5):511-25. PubMed ID: 18813186 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]