These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

463 related items for PubMed ID: 23625132

  • 41. Comparison of esophageal Doppler, pulse contour analysis, and real-time pulmonary artery thermodilution for the continuous measurement of cardiac output.
    Bein B, Worthmann F, Tonner PH, Paris A, Steinfath M, Hedderich J, Scholz J.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2004 Apr; 18(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 15073709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Femoral indicator injection for transpulmonary thermodilution using the EV1000/VolumeView(®): do the same criteria apply as for the PiCCO(®)?
    Huber W, Phillip V, Höllthaler J, Schultheiss C, Saugel B, Schmid RM.
    J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2016 Jul; 17(7):561-7. PubMed ID: 27381733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Uncalibrated arterial pulse contour analysis versus continuous thermodilution technique: effects of alterations in arterial waveform.
    Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S, Cromheecke S, De Hert SG.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2007 Oct; 21(5):636-43. PubMed ID: 17905266
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Comparison of PulsioFlex® uncalibrated pulse contour method and a modified Fick principle with transpulmonary thermodilution measurements in critically ill patients.
    Grensemann J, Defosse JM, Wieland C, Wild UW, Wappler F, Sakka SG.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 Jul; 44(4):484-90. PubMed ID: 27456179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Comparison of esCCO and transthoracic echocardiography for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output intensive care.
    Bataille B, Bertuit M, Mora M, Mazerolles M, Cocquet P, Masson B, Moussot PE, Ginot J, Silva S, Larché J.
    Br J Anaesth; 2012 Dec; 109(6):879-86. PubMed ID: 22907340
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Effect of the venous catheter site on transpulmonary thermodilution measurement variables.
    Schmidt S, Westhoff TH, Hofmann C, Schaefer JH, Zidek W, Compton F, van der Giet M.
    Crit Care Med; 2007 Mar; 35(3):783-6. PubMed ID: 17255873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Comparison of simultaneous estimation of cardiac output by four techniques in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery--a prospective observational study.
    Chakravarthy M, Patil TA, Jayaprakash K, Kalligudd P, Prabhakumar D, Jawali V.
    Ann Card Anaesth; 2007 Jul; 10(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 17644884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Validation of cardiac output monitoring based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis vs transpulmonary thermodilution during off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
    Smetkin AA, Hussain A, Kuzkov VV, Bjertnæs LJ, Kirov MY.
    Br J Anaesth; 2014 Jun; 112(6):1024-31. PubMed ID: 24531685
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography for cardiac output in critically ill patients: A pilot study of ultrasound versus the thermodilution method.
    Hammoudi N, Hékimian G, Laveau F, Achkar M, Isnard R, Combes A.
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Jan; 110(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 28017278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Reproducibility of thermodilution cardiac output determination in critically ill patients: comparison between bolus and continuous method.
    Le Tulzo Y, Belghith M, Seguin P, Dall'Ava J, Monchi M, Thomas R, Dhainaut JF.
    J Clin Monit; 1996 Sep; 12(5):379-85. PubMed ID: 8934344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Autocalibrating pulse contour analysis based on radial artery applanation tonometry for continuous non-invasive cardiac output monitoring in intensive care unit patients after major gastrointestinal surgery--a prospective method comparison study.
    Wagner JY, Langemann M, Schön G, Kluge S, Reuter DA, Saugel B.
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2016 May; 44(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 27246932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. Pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output vs. transpulmonary thermodilution cardiac output in two patients with intrathoracic pathology.
    Breukers RB, Jansen JR.
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2004 May; 48(5):658-61. PubMed ID: 15101866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Hemodynamic monitoring by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in critically ill children.
    Proulx F, Lemson J, Choker G, Tibby SM.
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Jul; 12(4):459-66. PubMed ID: 21263372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution.
    Goedje O, Hoeke K, Lichtwarck-Aschoff M, Faltchauser A, Lamm P, Reichart B.
    Crit Care Med; 1999 Nov; 27(11):2407-12. PubMed ID: 10579256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Cardiac index monitoring by pulse contour analysis and thermodilution after pediatric cardiac surgery.
    Fakler U, Pauli Ch, Balling G, Lorenz HP, Eicken A, Hennig M, Hess J.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Jan; 133(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 17198817
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Cross-comparison of cardiac output trending accuracy of LiDCO, PiCCO, FloTrac and pulmonary artery catheters.
    Hadian M, Kim HK, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR.
    Crit Care; 2010 Jan; 14(6):R212. PubMed ID: 21092290
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Accuracy of Continuous Cardiac Output Measurement With the LiDCOplus System During Intra-Aortic Counterpulsation After Cardiac Surgery.
    Menger J, Mora B, Skhirtladze K, Fischer A, Jan Ankersmit H, Dworschak M.
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2016 Jun; 30(3):592-8. PubMed ID: 26718662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Calibrated versus uncalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis in monitoring cardiac output with transpulmonary thermodilution in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.
    Slagt C, Helmi M, Malagon I, Groeneveld AB.
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jan; 32(1):5-12. PubMed ID: 25387298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Assessment of three minimally invasive continuous cardiac output measurement methods in critically ill patients and a review of the literature.
    Palmers PJ, Vidts W, Ameloot K, Cordemans C, Van Regenmortel N, De Laet I, Schoonheydt K, Dits H, Eichhorn V, Reuter D, Malbrain ML.
    Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther; 2012 Jan; 44(4):188-99. PubMed ID: 23348485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Evaluation of a new continuous thermodilution cardiac output monitor in critically ill patients: a prospective criterion standard study.
    Haller M, Zöllner C, Briegel J, Forst H.
    Crit Care Med; 1995 May; 23(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 7736744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 24.