These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

381 related items for PubMed ID: 23629077

  • 1. A comparison of acellular dermal matrix to autologous dermal flaps in single-stage, implant-based immediate breast reconstruction: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Van Vliet MM, Powell SG, Rosen JM, Nigriny JF.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):953-961. PubMed ID: 23629077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The cost effectiveness of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant immediate breast reconstruction.
    Krishnan NM, Chatterjee A, Rosenkranz KM, Powell SG, Nigriny JF, Vidal DC.
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Apr; 67(4):468-76. PubMed ID: 24508194
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cost analysis of postmastectomy reconstruction: A comparison of two staged implant reconstruction using tissue expander and acellular dermal matrix with abdominal-based perforator free flaps.
    Tran BNN, Fadayomi A, Lin SJ, Singhal D, Lee BT.
    J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):439-447. PubMed ID: 28591940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Retrospective review of 331 consecutive immediate single-stage implant reconstructions with acellular dermal matrix: indications, complications, trends, and costs.
    Colwell AS, Damjanovic B, Zahedi B, Medford-Davis L, Hertl C, Austen WG.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Dec; 128(6):1170-1178. PubMed ID: 22094736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Is Single-Stage Prosthetic Reconstruction Cost Effective? A Cost-Utility Analysis for the Use of Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction Relative to Expander-Implant Reconstruction in Postmastectomy Patients.
    Krishnan NM, Fischer JP, Basta MN, Nahabedian MY.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Sep; 138(3):537-547. PubMed ID: 27556599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Implant-based immediate reconstruction in prophylactic mastectomy: is the caudal dermis flap a reliable alternative to synthetic mesh or acellular dermal matrix?
    Heine N, Hoesl V, Seitz S, Prantl L, Brebant V.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Apr; 305(4):937-943. PubMed ID: 34554314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Breast Reconstruction Options in the Setting of Postmastectomy Radiotherapy Using the BREAST-Q.
    Razdan SN, Cordeiro PG, Albornoz CR, Ro T, Cohen WA, Mehrara BJ, McCarthy CM, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, Matros E.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):510e-517e. PubMed ID: 26910695
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. 440 Consecutive immediate, implant-based, single-surgeon breast reconstructions in 281 patients: a comparison of early outcomes and costs between SurgiMend fetal bovine and AlloDerm human cadaveric acellular dermal matrices.
    Butterfield JL.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 May; 131(5):940-951. PubMed ID: 23629076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Acellular Dermal Matrix in Immediate Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Multicenter Assessment of Risks and Benefits.
    Sorkin M, Qi J, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Kozlow JH, Pusic AL, Wilkins EG.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017 Dec; 140(6):1091-1100. PubMed ID: 28806288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparing Outcomes of Wise-Pattern, Two-Stage Breast Reduction-Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix.
    Patel AA, Kayaleh H, Sala LA, Peterson DJ, Upadhyaya PK.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Sep 01; 148(3):511-521. PubMed ID: 34432681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sterile "ready-to-use" AlloDerm decreases postoperative infectious complications in patients undergoing immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix.
    Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Saadeh PB, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct 01; 132(4):725-736. PubMed ID: 23783060
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The use of acellular dermal matrix in immediate two-stage tissue expander breast reconstruction.
    Weichman KE, Wilson SC, Weinstein AL, Hazen A, Levine JP, Choi M, Karp NS.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 May 01; 129(5):1049-1058. PubMed ID: 22544088
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Decreased Length of Postoperative Drain Use, Parenteral Opioids, Length of Stay, and Complication Rates in Patients Receiving Meshed versus Unmeshed Acellular Dermal Matrix in 194 Submuscular Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstructions: A Single-Surgeon Cohort Study.
    Hagarty SE, Yen LL, Luo J, Fosco CR, Gomez K, Khare M.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr 01; 145(4):889-897. PubMed ID: 32221196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An algorithmic approach for selective acellular dermal matrix use in immediate two-stage breast reconstruction: indications and outcomes.
    Jordan SW, Khavanin N, Fine NA, Kim JYS.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Aug 01; 134(2):178-188. PubMed ID: 25068318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of acellular dermal matrix in expander-implant breast reconstruction after total skin-sparing mastectomy: results of a prospective practice improvement study.
    Peled AW, Foster RD, Garwood ER, Moore DH, Ewing CA, Alvarado M, Hwang ES, Esserman LJ.
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Jun 01; 129(6):901e-908e. PubMed ID: 22634688
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.