These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

198 related items for PubMed ID: 23632651

  • 1. Modulation frequency discrimination with modulated and unmodulated interference in normal hearing and in cochlear-implant users.
    Kreft HA, Nelson DA, Oxenham AJ.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 14(4):591-601. PubMed ID: 23632651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Perception of stochastic envelopes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
    Gomersall PA, Turner RE, Baguley DM, Deeks JM, Gockel HE, Carlyon RP.
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():8-24. PubMed ID: 26706708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
    Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Mar; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Mismatch negativity (MMN) objectively reflects timbre discrimination thresholds in normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.
    Rahne T, Plontke SK, Wagner L.
    Brain Res; 2014 Oct 24; 1586():143-51. PubMed ID: 25152464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul 24; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
    Camarena A, Goldsworthy RL.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul 24; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. What breaks a melody: perceiving F0 and intensity sequences with a cochlear implant.
    Cousineau M, Demany L, Meyer B, Pressnitzer D.
    Hear Res; 2010 Oct 01; 269(1-2):34-41. PubMed ID: 20674733
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on temporal coding of harmonic and inharmonic tone complexes in the auditory nerve.
    Kale S, Micheyl C, Heinz MG.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Oct 01; 787():109-18. PubMed ID: 23716215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
    Heng J, Cantarero G, Elhilali M, Limb CJ.
    Hear Res; 2011 Oct 01; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modulation rate discrimination using half-wave rectified and sinusoidally amplitude modulated stimuli in cochlear-implant users.
    Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ, Nelson DA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb 01; 127(2):656-9. PubMed ID: 20136187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Binaural cue sensitivity in cochlear implant recipients with acoustic hearing preservation.
    Gifford RH, Stecker GC.
    Hear Res; 2020 May 01; 390():107929. PubMed ID: 32182551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Timbre discrimination in cochlear implant users and normal hearing subjects using cross-faded synthetic tones.
    Rahne T, Böhme L, Götze G.
    J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Aug 15; 199(2):290-5. PubMed ID: 21664377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Spectral and temporal measures in hybrid cochlear implant users: on the mechanism of electroacoustic hearing benefits.
    Golub JS, Won JH, Drennan WR, Worman TD, Rubinstein JT.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Feb 15; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 22215451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Spectro-temporal analysis in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW, Davis AC, Haggard MP, Pillsbury HC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Oct 15; 84(4):1325-31. PubMed ID: 3198867
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Sensitivity to Envelope Interaural Time Differences at High Modulation Rates.
    Monaghan JJ, Bleeck S, McAlpine D.
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721926
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing.
    Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG.
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr 30; 25(2):173-85. PubMed ID: 15064662
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.