These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners. Bernstein JG, Mehraei G, Shamma S, Gallun FJ, Theodoroff SM, Leek MR. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):293-306. PubMed ID: 23636210 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss. Smith SL, Pichora-Fuller MK, Wilson RH, Macdonald EN. Ear Hear; 2012 Apr; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Effects of FM and Hearing Aid Microphone Settings, FM Gain, and Ambient Noise Levels on SNR at the Tympanic Membrane. Norrix LW, Camarota K, Harris FP, Dean J. J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Feb; 27(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 26905531 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of Audibility and Suprathreshold Deficits on Speech Recognition for Listeners With Unilateral Hearing Loss. Bost TJM, Versfeld NJ, Goverts ST. Ear Hear; 2019 Feb; 40(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 31242137 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Speech intelligibility benefits of hearing AIDS at various input levels. Kuk F, Lau CC, Korhonen P, Crose B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 25751695 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cortical auditory-evoked potentials (CAEPs) in adults in response to filtered speech stimuli. Carter L, Dillon H, Seymour J, Seeto M, Van Dun B. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Oct; 24(9):807-22. PubMed ID: 24224988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing auditory filter bandwidths, spectral ripple modulation detection, spectral ripple discrimination, and speech recognition: Normal and impaired hearing. Davies-Venn E, Nelson P, Souza P. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):492-503. PubMed ID: 26233047 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age. Kortlang S, Mauermann M, Ewert SD. Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of presentation level on normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' acceptable speech and noise levels. Recker KL, Edwards BW. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jan; 24(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 23231813 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Relationship between Random Gap Detection and Hearing in Noise Test Performances. Heeke P, Vermiglio AJ, Bulla E, Velappan K, Fang X. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(10):948-954. PubMed ID: 30479267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Listener Factors Associated with Individual Susceptibility to Reverberation. Reinhart PN, Souza PE. J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jan; 29(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 29309025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors affecting masking release for speech in modulated noise for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. George EL, Festen JM, Houtgast T. J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2295-311. PubMed ID: 17069325 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]