These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1086 related items for PubMed ID: 23636208

  • 21. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ, Soli SD, Freed DJ, Fisher LM.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. The effect of hearing aid technologies on listening in an automobile.
    Wu YH, Stangl E, Bentler RA, Stanziola RW.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):474-85. PubMed ID: 23886425
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Outcomes of Hearing Aid Use by Individuals with Unilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss (USNHL).
    Bishop CE, Hamadain E, Galster JA, Johnson MF, Spankovich C, Windmill I.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Jun; 28(10):941-949. PubMed ID: 29130442
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Application of frequency importance functions to directivity for prediction of benefit in uniform fields.
    Ricketts TA, Henry PP, Hornsby BW.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Oct; 26(5):473-86. PubMed ID: 16230897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. The effect of intensity perturbations on speech intelligibility for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    van Schijndel NH, Houtgast T, Festen JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 May; 109(5 Pt 1):2202-10. PubMed ID: 11386571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. The effects of selective consonant amplification on sentence recognition in noise by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Saripella R, Loizou PC, Thibodeau L, Alford JA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Nov; 130(5):3028-37. PubMed ID: 22087930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Subjective Speech Intelligibility Drives Noise-Tolerance Domain Use During the Tracking of Noise-Tolerance Test.
    Kuk F, Slugocki C, Korhonen P.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Nov; 45(6):1484-1495. PubMed ID: 38880961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Impact of SNR, masker type and noise reduction processing on sentence recognition performance and listening effort as indicated by the pupil dilation response.
    Ohlenforst B, Wendt D, Kramer SE, Naylor G, Zekveld AA, Lunner T.
    Hear Res; 2018 Aug; 365():90-99. PubMed ID: 29779607
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Speech Recognition at the Acceptable Noise Level.
    Gordon-Hickey S, Morlas H.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 May; 26(5):443-450. PubMed ID: 26055834
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Electrophysiology and Perception of Speech in Noise in Older Listeners: Effects of Hearing Impairment and Age.
    Billings CJ, Penman TM, McMillan GP, Ellis EM.
    Ear Hear; 2015 May; 36(6):710-22. PubMed ID: 26502191
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Efficacy of a reverse cardioid directional microphone.
    Kuk F, Keenan D.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan; 23(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 22284842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.
    Jin SH, Nelson PB.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):3097-108. PubMed ID: 16708964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. The effects of energetic and informational masking on The Words-in-Noise Test (WIN).
    Wilson RH, Trivette CP, Williams DA, Watts KL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(7):522-33. PubMed ID: 22992259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
    Hall JW, Buss E, Grose JH, Roush PA.
    Ear Hear; 2012 May; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Spatial benefit of bilateral hearing AIDS.
    Ahlstrom JB, Horwitz AR, Dubno JR.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):203-18. PubMed ID: 19194292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K, Valente M.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Conclusion: predicting speech intelligibility by individual hearing-impaired listeners: the path forward.
    Grant KW, Bernstein JG, Summers V.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Apr; 24(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 23636212
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Predicted and measured speech recognition performance in noise with linear amplification.
    Magnusson L, Karlsson M, Leijon A.
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11271975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. The Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test (R-SPIN) in a multiple signal-to-noise ratio paradigm.
    Wilson RH, McArdle R, Watts KL, Smith SL.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Sep; 23(8):590-605. PubMed ID: 22967734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA, Kramer SE, Festen JM.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Sep; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 55.