These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. The relationship between preoperative factors and the presence of intramedullary increased signal intensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Wei L, Cao P, Xu C, Liu Y, Chen H, Wang X, Tian Y, Yuan W. Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Mar 01; 178():1-6. PubMed ID: 30660852 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of radiological descriptions of spinal cord compression with quantitative measures, and their role in non-specialist clinical management. Tempest-Mitchell J, Hilton B, Davies BM, Nouri A, Hutchinson PJ, Scoffings DJ, Mannion RJ, Trivedi R, Timofeev I, Crawford JR, Hay D, Laing RJ, Kotter MRN. PLoS One; 2019 Mar 01; 14(7):e0219380. PubMed ID: 31329621 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A Technique for Dynamic Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging Applied to Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Reliability Study. Pratali RR, Smith JS, Ancheschi BC, Maranho DA, Savarese A, Nogueira-Barbosa MH, Herrero CFPS. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Jan 01; 44(1):E26-E32. PubMed ID: 29952883 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlations between preoperative diffusion tensor imaging and surgical outcome in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Tian X, Zhang L, Zhang X, Meng L, Li X. Am J Transl Res; 2021 Jan 01; 13(10):11461-11471. PubMed ID: 34786072 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Association of myelopathy scores with cervical sagittal balance and normalized spinal cord volume: analysis of 56 preoperative cases from the AOSpine North America Myelopathy study. Smith JS, Lafage V, Ryan DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab FJ, Patel AA, Brodke DS, Arnold PM, Riew KD, Traynelis VC, Radcliff K, Vaccaro AR, Fehlings MG, Ames CP. Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct 15; 38(22 Suppl 1):S161-70. PubMed ID: 23963001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic value of magnetic resonance imaging measurements for assessing cervical spinal canal stenosis. Rüegg TB, Wicki AG, Aebli N, Wisianowsky C, Krebs J. J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Mar 15; 22(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 25525959 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Relationship Between Preoperative Clinical Presentation and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Nouri A, Tetreault L, Dalzell K, Zamorano JJ, Fehlings MG. Neurosurgery; 2017 Jan 01; 80(1):121-128. PubMed ID: 27607403 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with standing cervical radiographs for evaluation of vertebral canal stenosis in equine cervical stenotic myelopathy. Janes JG, Garrett KS, McQuerry KJ, Pease AP, Williams NM, Reed SM, MacLeod JN. Equine Vet J; 2014 Nov 01; 46(6):681-6. PubMed ID: 24329734 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]