These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

801 related items for PubMed ID: 23643562

  • 1. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Prestimulus EEG amplitude determinants of ERP responses in a habituation paradigm.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ, Steiner GZ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):444-50. PubMed ID: 23732790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prestimulus delta and theta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Aug; 130():40-52. PubMed ID: 29775640
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Preferred EEG brain states at stimulus onset in a fixed interstimulus interval equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a definitive study.
    Barry RJ, De Blasio FM, De Pascalis V, Karamacoska D.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct; 94(1):42-58. PubMed ID: 25043955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. EEG-ERP phase dynamics of children in the auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Dec; 86(3):251-61. PubMed ID: 23046586
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prestimulus alpha and beta contributions to equiprobable Go/NoGo processing in healthy ageing.
    De Blasio FM, Barry RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Sep; 155():32-40. PubMed ID: 32479772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. EEG phase states at stimulus onset in a variable-ISI Go/NoGo task: Effects on ERP components.
    Barry RJ, Fogarty JS, De Blasio FM, Karamacoska D.
    Biol Psychol; 2018 Apr; 134():89-102. PubMed ID: 29462656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Brain dynamics in the auditory oddball task as a function of stimulus intensity and task requirements.
    Barry RJ, Rushby JA, Smith JL, Clarke AR, Croft RJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Sep; 73(3):313-25. PubMed ID: 19460406
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E, Bayraktaroglu Z, Gurvit H, Keskin YH, Emre M, Demiralp T.
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug 09; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Varying task difficulty in the Go/Nogo task: the effects of inhibitory control, arousal, and perceived effort on ERP components.
    Benikos N, Johnstone SJ, Roodenrys SJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar 09; 87(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 22902315
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ, Johnstone SJ, Clarke AR, Rushby JA, Brown CR, McKenzie DN.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec 09; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.
    Thomas SJ, Gonsalvez CJ, Johnstone SJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec 09; 74(3):209-19. PubMed ID: 19751776
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul 09; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD, Falkenstein M.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar 09; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Sequential processing in an auditory equiprobable Go/NoGo task with variable interstimulus interval.
    Borchard JP, Barry RJ, De Blasio FM.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug 09; 97(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 26024616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
    Karamacoska D, Barry RJ, Steiner GZ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec 09; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Stimulus-to-matching-stimulus interval influences N1, P2, and P3b in an equiprobable Go/NoGo task.
    Steiner GZ, Barry RJ, Gonsalvez CJ.
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Oct 09; 94(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 25034341
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 41.