These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

287 related items for PubMed ID: 23649066

  • 21. Near-end of treatment panoramic radiograph in the assessment of mesiodistal root angulation.
    Owens AM, Johal A.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):475-81. PubMed ID: 18416620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.
    Upadhyay M, Yadav S, Patil S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):803-10. PubMed ID: 19061808
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars.
    Mahasantipiya PM, Savage NW, Monsour PA, Wilson RJ.
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):154-63. PubMed ID: 15897286
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Prediction of mandibular third-molar impaction in adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Behbehani F, Artun J, Thalib L.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jul; 130(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16849071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome.
    Bell GW.
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2004 Feb; 42(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 14706294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment.
    Armstrong D, Kharbanda OP, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA.
    Aust Orthod J; 2006 Nov; 22(2):153-60. PubMed ID: 17203580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Assessment of the reliability of root angulations on panoramic radiographs.
    Dholakia KD, Bhat SR.
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011 Nov; 12(2):96-107. PubMed ID: 21935503
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Effects of Lower Third Molar Angulation and Position on Lower Arch Crowding.
    Selmani ME, Gjorgova J, Selmani ME, Shkreta M, Duci SB.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016 Nov; 27(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 27319042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effect of buccolingual root angulation on the mesiodistal angulation shown on panoramic radiographs.
    Garcia-Figueroa MA, Raboud DW, Lam EW, Heo G, Major PW.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18617108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Third molar angulation during and after treatment of adolescent orthodontic patients.
    Artun J, Thalib L, Little RM.
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 16009666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Radiographic study of the positional changes and eruption of impacted third molars in young adults of an Asian Indian population.
    Sandhu S, Kaur T.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Aug; 66(8):1617-24. PubMed ID: 18634949
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
    Tai K, Hotokezaka H, Park JH, Tai H, Miyajima K, Choi M, Kai LM, Mishima K.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Radiographic assessment of lower third molar eruption in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns and age-related groups.
    Jakovljevic A, Lazic E, Soldatovic I, Nedeljkovic N, Andric M.
    Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):577-84. PubMed ID: 25244087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Force magnitude and duration effects on amount of tooth movement and root resorption in the rat molar.
    Gonzales C, Hotokezaka H, Yoshimatsu M, Yozgatian JH, Darendeliler MA, Yoshida N.
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):502-9. PubMed ID: 18416627
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Midpalatal miniscrews and high-pull headgear for anteroposterior and vertical anchorage control: cephalometric comparisons of treatment changes.
    Lee J, Miyazawa K, Tabuchi M, Kawaguchi M, Shibata M, Goto S.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):238-50. PubMed ID: 23910205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Study the predisposing factors of root resorption during orthodontic uprighting treatment of impacted mandibular third molars.
    Wang Y, Min HY, Chen Z, Xie X, Qin C, Zheng Y, Mo S.
    Int Orthod; 2019 Jun; 17(2):249-255. PubMed ID: 31040074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Is bodily advancement of the lower incisors possible?
    Strahm C, De Sousa AP, Grobéty D, Mavropoulos A, Kiliaridis S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 19395370
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Rate of mesial translation of mandibular molars using implant-anchored mechanics.
    Roberts WE, Arbuckle GR, Analoui M.
    Angle Orthod; 1996 Aug; 66(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 8893103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Physical properties of root cementum: part 14. The amount of root resorption after force application for 12 weeks on maxillary and mandibular premolars: a microcomputed-tomography study.
    Paetyangkul A, Türk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Jones AS, Petocz P, Darendeliler MA.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Oct; 136(4):492.e1-9; discussion 492-3. PubMed ID: 19815148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of two cone beam computed tomographic systems versus panoramic imaging for localization of impacted maxillary canines and detection of root resorption.
    Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Fieuws S, Willems G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 21270321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.