These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

284 related items for PubMed ID: 23652467

  • 1. Comparison of optical quality parameters and ocular aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis versus wavefront-guided laser epithelial keratomileusis for myopia.
    Lee K, Ahn JM, Kim EK, Kim TI.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Sep; 251(9):2163-9. PubMed ID: 23652467
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors.
    Li SM, Kang MT, Wang NL, Abariga SA.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2020 Dec 18; 12(12):CD012687. PubMed ID: 33336797
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy.
    Chung SH, Lee IS, Lee YG, Lee HK, Kim EK, Yoon G, Seo KY.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2006 May 18; 32(5):779-84. PubMed ID: 16765794
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
    Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Shimizu K, Matsumura K, Komatsu M.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun 18; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Topography-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia: Surgical outcomes.
    Kim J, Choi SH, Lim DH, Yang CM, Yoon GJ, Chung TY.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Jul 18; 45(7):959-965. PubMed ID: 31196580
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of visual acuity, higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity after refractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
    Kamiya K, Shimizu K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H, Komatsu M.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug 18; 97(8):968-75. PubMed ID: 23269682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.
    Lim SA, Park Y, Cheong YJ, Na KS, Joo CK.
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr 18; 30(2):92-100. PubMed ID: 27051256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of higher-order aberration and optical quality after Epi-LASIK and LASIK for myopia.
    Yang X, Wang Y, Zhao K, Fang L.
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb 18; 249(2):281-8. PubMed ID: 20449603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.
    Zhou J, Gu W, Li S, Wu L, Gao Y, Guo X.
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan 18; 40(1):213-225. PubMed ID: 31571091
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison of the optical quality after SMILE and FS-LASIK for high myopia by OQAS and iTrace analyzer: a one-year retrospective study.
    Yin Y, Lu Y, Xiang A, Fu Y, Zhao Y, Li Y, Hu T, Du K, Hu S, Fu Q, Wu X, Wen D.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Aug 02; 21(1):292. PubMed ID: 34340669
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Advanced corneal surface ablation efficacy in myopia: changes in higher order aberrations.
    AlMahmoud T, Munger R, Jackson WB.
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr 02; 46(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 21708087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Wavefront-Guided Laser Treatment Using a High-Resolution Aberrometer to Measure Irregular Corneas: A Pilot Study.
    Shaheen MS, El-Kateb M, Hafez TA, Piñero DP, Khalifa MA.
    J Refract Surg; 2015 Jun 02; 31(6):411-8. PubMed ID: 26046709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
    He L, Liu A, Manche EE.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun 02; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of LASEK and LASIK with thin and ultrathin flaps after excimer laser ablation with the SCHWIND Aspheric ablation profile.
    Arbelaez MC, Vidal C, Arba Mosquera S.
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Jan 02; 27(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 20438023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia.
    Shin JY, Ahn H, Seo KY, Kim EK, Kim TI.
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb 02; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22074464
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
    El Awady HE, Ghanem AA, Saleh SM.
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011 Feb 02; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia.
    Chen X, Wang Y, Zhang J, Yang SN, Li X, Zhang L.
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr 07; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28388896
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.