These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

184 related items for PubMed ID: 2368953

  • 1. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in horses.
    Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ.
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Jun; 51(6):935-7. PubMed ID: 2368953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of two applanation tonometers in cats.
    Miller PE, Pickett JP, Majors LJ, Kurzman ID.
    Am J Vet Res; 1991 Nov; 52(11):1917-21. PubMed ID: 1785739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of three applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Priehs DR, Gum GG, Whitley RD, Moore LE.
    Am J Vet Res; 1990 Oct; 51(10):1547-50. PubMed ID: 2240775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of applanation tonometers in dogs and horses.
    Dziezyc J, Millichamp NJ, Smith WB.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Aug 01; 201(3):430-3. PubMed ID: 1506245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal dogs.
    Miller PE, Pickett JP.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct 01; 201(7):1021-5. PubMed ID: 1429125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of the use of new handheld tonometers and established applanation tonometers in dogs.
    Görig C, Coenen RT, Stades FC, Djajadiningrat-Laanen SC, Boevé MH.
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jan 01; 67(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 16426223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of the human and canine Schiotz tonometry conversion tables in clinically normal cats.
    Miller PE, Pickett JP.
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1992 Oct 01; 201(7):1017-20. PubMed ID: 1429124
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Accuracy of the new ICare rebound tonometer vs. other portable tonometers in healthy eyes.
    García-Resúa C, González-Meijome JM, Gilino J, Yebra-Pimentel E.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Feb 01; 83(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 16501412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparison of a rebound and an applanation tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in normal rabbits.
    Pereira FQ, Bercht BS, Soares MG, da Mota MG, Pigatto JA.
    Vet Ophthalmol; 2011 Sep 01; 14(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 21929609
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
    Thompson-Hom AL, Gerding PA.
    Am J Vet Res; 2012 May 01; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Effect of head position on intraocular pressure in horses.
    Komáromy AM, Garg CD, Ying GS, Liu C.
    Am J Vet Res; 2006 Jul 01; 67(7):1232-5. PubMed ID: 16817748
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.