These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Facilitation and inhibition arising from the exogenous orienting of covert attention depends on the temporal properties of spatial cues and targets. Maruff P, Yucel M, Danckert J, Stuart G, Currie J. Neuropsychologia; 1999 Jun; 37(6):731-44. PubMed ID: 10390035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Reed CL, Grubb JD, Steele C. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):166-77. PubMed ID: 16478334 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. How efficient is the orienting of spatial attention to pain? An experimental investigation. Van Damme S, Legrain V. Pain; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1226-1231. PubMed ID: 22480802 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Haptic over visual information in the distribution of visual attention after tool-use in near and far space. Park GD, Reed CL. Exp Brain Res; 2015 Oct; 233(10):2977-88. PubMed ID: 26126805 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Attention orienting near the hand following performed and imagined actions. Garza JP, Reed CL, Roberts RJ. Exp Brain Res; 2018 Oct; 236(10):2603-2610. PubMed ID: 29959452 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in trunk orientation do not induce asymmetries in covert orienting. Westwood DA, Jones SA, Cowper-Smith CD, Klein RM. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Aug; 75(6):1193-205. PubMed ID: 23666630 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing. Barthélémy S, Boulinguez P. Behav Brain Res; 2002 Jun 15; 133(1):109-16. PubMed ID: 12048178 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Object-guided spatial selection in touch without concurrent changes in the perceived location of the hands. Gillmeister H, Cantarella S, Gheorghiu AI, Adler J. Exp Psychol; 2013 Jun 15; 60(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 23047917 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Within-hemifield posture changes affect tactile-visual exogenous spatial cueing without spatial precision, especially in the dark. Kennett S, Driver J. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May 15; 76(4):1121-35. PubMed ID: 24470256 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Handedness and Graspability Modify Shifts of Visuospatial Attention to Near-Hand Objects. Colman HA, Remington RW, Kritikos A. PLoS One; 2017 May 15; 12(1):e0170542. PubMed ID: 28125635 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Reed CL, Betz R, Garza JP, Roberts RJ. Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan 15; 72(1):236-45. PubMed ID: 20045892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Neural correlates of the spatial and expectancy components of endogenous and stimulus-driven orienting of attention in the Posner task. Doricchi F, Macci E, Silvetti M, Macaluso E. Cereb Cortex; 2010 Jul 01; 20(7):1574-85. PubMed ID: 19846472 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]