These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1701 related items for PubMed ID: 23744895

  • 21. Freeze-all, oocyte vitrification, or fresh embryo transfer? Lessons from an egg-sharing donation program.
    Braga DP, Setti AS, Figueira RC, Azevedo Mde C, Iaconelli A, Lo Turco EG, Borges E.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep 01; 106(3):615-22. PubMed ID: 27262501
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Clinical validation of a closed vitrification system in an oocyte-donation programme.
    Stoop D, De Munck N, Jansen E, Platteau P, Van den Abbeel E, Verheyen G, Devroey P.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Feb 01; 24(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22222248
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.
    Rienzi L, Romano S, Albricci L, Maggiulli R, Capalbo A, Baroni E, Colamaria S, Sapienza F, Ubaldi F.
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Jan 01; 25(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 19861328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Effect of oocyte donor stimulation on recipient outcomes: data from a US national donor oocyte bank.
    Hipp HS, Gaskins AJ, Nagy ZP, Capelouto SM, Shapiro DB, Spencer JB.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr 28; 35(4):847-858. PubMed ID: 32142582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. [Effects of cryopreservation time and thawing method of human oocyte vitrification on the outcome of assisted reproduction].
    Song WY, Sun YP, Jin HX, Xin ZM, Su YC, Guo YH, Chen ZJ.
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Aug 28; 45(8):578-82. PubMed ID: 21029612
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Elective and Onco-fertility preservation: factors related to IVF outcomes.
    Cobo A, García-Velasco J, Domingo J, Pellicer A, Remohí J.
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Dec 01; 33(12):2222-2231. PubMed ID: 30383235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
    Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P.
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug 01; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Outcomes of vitrified-warmed day-4 embryos after day-3 cleavage-stage biopsy.
    Kahraman S, Candan ZN.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov 01; 21(5):636-41. PubMed ID: 20920891
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. How does closed system vitrification of human oocytes affect the clinical outcome? A prospective, observational, cohort, noninferiority trial in an oocyte donation program.
    Papatheodorou A, Vanderzwalmen P, Panagiotidis Y, Petousis S, Gullo G, Kasapi E, Goudakou M, Prapas N, Zikopoulos K, Georgiou I, Prapas Y.
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Nov 01; 106(6):1348-1355. PubMed ID: 27490043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Testing an artificial intelligence algorithm to predict fetal heartbeat of vitrified-warmed blastocysts from a single image: predictive ability in different settings.
    Conversa L, Bori L, Insua F, Marqueño S, Cobo A, Meseguer M.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Oct 01; 39(10):2240-2248. PubMed ID: 39173597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Cumulative pregnancy rates of two strategies: Day 3 fresh embryo transfer followed by Day 3 or Day 5/6 vitrification and embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial.
    Mengels A, Van Muylder A, Peeraer K, Luyten J, Laenen A, Spiessens C, Debrock S.
    Hum Reprod; 2024 Jan 05; 39(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 37886820
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Embryo vitrification using a novel semi-automated closed system yields in vitro outcomes equivalent to the manual Cryotop method.
    Roy TK, Brandi S, Tappe NM, Bradley CK, Vom E, Henderson C, Lewis C, Battista K, Hobbs B, Hobbs S, Syer J, Lanyon SR, Dopheide SM, Peura TT, McArthur SJ, Bowman MC, Stojanov T.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Nov 05; 29(11):2431-8. PubMed ID: 25164022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Outcomes of vitrified early cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage embryos in a cryopreservation program: evaluation of 3,150 warming cycles.
    Cobo A, de los Santos MJ, Castellò D, Gámiz P, Campos P, Remohí J.
    Fertil Steril; 2012 Nov 05; 98(5):1138-46.e1. PubMed ID: 22862909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.
    Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Pérez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohí J.
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jun 05; 89(6):1657-64. PubMed ID: 17889865
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Effective protection: the embryonic development and clinical outcomes of emergency vitrification of 1246 oocytes and Day 0-Day 5 embryos in a natural disaster.
    Song W, Zhang F, Wang Y, Shi H, Sun N, Jin H, Wang X, Guo Y, Hu L, Zhai J, Dai S, Zhang Y, Su Y, Yao G, Shi S, Wen S, Song N, Wu Z, Chen L, Cheng T, Kang B, Sun J, Huang X, Sun Z, Cheng L, Liang Y, Sun Y.
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec 04; 38(12):2412-2421. PubMed ID: 37846525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Oocyte cryopreservation and in vitro culture affect calcium signalling during human fertilization.
    Nikiforaki D, Vanden Meerschaut F, Qian C, De Croo I, Lu Y, Deroo T, Van den Abbeel E, Heindryckx B, De Sutter P.
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan 04; 29(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 24218403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Oocyte versus embryo vitrification for delayed embryo transfer: an observational study.
    Herrero L, Pareja S, Aragonés M, Cobo A, Bronet F, Garcia-Velasco JA.
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Nov 04; 29(5):567-72. PubMed ID: 25246115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Donor oocyte recipients do not benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy to improve pregnancy outcomes.
    Doyle N, Gainty M, Eubanks A, Doyle J, Hayes H, Tucker M, Devine K, DeCherney A, Levy M, Jahandideh S, Hill M.
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov 01; 35(11):2548-2555. PubMed ID: 33057600
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 86.