These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

519 related items for PubMed ID: 2374743

  • 1. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S, Yogesh BG.
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of different transitional restorations on the fracture resistance of premolar teeth.
    Qualtrough AJ, Cawte SG, Wilson NH.
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 11357569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Fracture resistance of teeth directly and indirectly restored with composite resin and indirectly restored with ceramic materials.
    Dalpino PH, Francischone CE, Ishikiriama A, Franco EB.
    Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 12691276
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: fracture resistance and fracture mode.
    Soares PV, Santos-Filho PC, Martins LR, Soares CJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jan; 99(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18182183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with glass ionomer cement or acid etch composite resin.
    Trope M, Tronstad L.
    J Endod; 1991 Jun; 17(6):257-9. PubMed ID: 1940749
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques.
    Siso SH, Hürmüzlü F, Turgut M, Altundaşar E, Serper A, Er K.
    Int Endod J; 2007 Mar; 40(3):161-8. PubMed ID: 17305692
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars.
    Yamada Y, Tsubota Y, Fukushima S.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 17(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15008239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A, Donly KJ, Stratmann RG.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class II bonded amalgam and new tooth-colored restorations.
    Görücü J, Ozgünaltay G.
    Oper Dent; 2003 Oct; 28(5):501-7. PubMed ID: 14531594
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lateral-access Class II restoration using resin-modified glass-ionomer or silver-cermet cement.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):121-6. PubMed ID: 7568722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.
    Croll TP.
    Quintessence Int; 1988 Aug; 19(8):533-9. PubMed ID: 2978627
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated premolars adhesively restored.
    Ausiello P, De Gee AJ, Rengo S, Davidson CL.
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):237-41. PubMed ID: 9522698
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
    Oliveira JP, Cochran MA, Moore BK.
    Oper Dent; 1996 Oct; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R, Lidums A, Smales R.
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Fracture strength and fracture patterns of maxillary premolars with approximal slot cavities.
    el-Mowafy OM.
    Oper Dent; 1993 Aug; 18(4):160-6. PubMed ID: 8152985
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Marginal ridge fracture resistance, microleakage and pulpal response to glass ionomer/glass cermet partial tunnel restorations.
    Prabhu NT, Munshi AK, Shetty TR.
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1997 Aug; 21(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 9484134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Compression resistance in premolars with OM cavities and palatally excavated cusps when obturated].
    Pérez Gutiérrez I, Navajas Rodríguez de Mondelo JM.
    Av Odontoestomatol; 1989 Dec; 5(10):679-84. PubMed ID: 2640098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.
    Sengun A, Cobankara FK, Orucoglu H.
    Dent Traumatol; 2008 Apr; 24(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18352927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Resistance of cavity walls of composite filled teeth].
    Fabianelli A, De Luca S, Garberoglio R.
    Dent Cadmos; 1991 Sep 15; 59(13):94-100, 103-4. PubMed ID: 1824368
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.