These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

642 related items for PubMed ID: 23755873

  • 1. Reproducibility of a long-range swept-source optical coherence tomography ocular biometry system and comparison with clinical biometers.
    Grulkowski I, Liu JJ, Zhang JY, Potsaid B, Jayaraman V, Cable AE, Duker JS, Fujimoto JG.
    Ophthalmology; 2013 Nov; 120(11):2184-90. PubMed ID: 23755873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Repeatability and interobserver reproducibility of a new optical biometer based on swept-source optical coherence tomography and comparison with IOLMaster.
    Huang J, Savini G, Hoffer KJ, Chen H, Lu W, Hu Q, Bao F, Wang Q.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 101(4):493-498. PubMed ID: 27503393
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Repeatability and agreement in optical biometry of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer versus partial coherence interferometry and optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Kunert KS, Peter M, Blum M, Haigis W, Sekundo W, Schütze J, Büehren T.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 26948781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Split-Window OCT biometry in pseudophakic eyes.
    Sikorski BL, Hoffer KJ.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2022 Dec; 100(8):e1685-e1690. PubMed ID: 35670319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Agreement between 2 swept-source OCT biometers and a Scheimpflug partial coherence interferometer.
    Tañá-Rivero P, Aguilar-Córcoles S, Tello-Elordi C, Pastor-Pascual F, Montés-Micó R.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Apr 01; 47(4):488-495. PubMed ID: 33252569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Repeatability and reproducibility of a new fully automatic measurement optical low coherence reflectometry biometer and agreement with swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometer.
    Yu J, Zhao G, Lei CS, Wan T, Ning R, Xing W, Ma X, Pan H, Savini G, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Zhou X, Huang J.
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2024 May 21; 108(5):673-678. PubMed ID: 37142332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Agreement between intraoperative anterior segment spectral-domain OCT and 2 swept-source OCT biometers.
    Tañá-Sanz P, Ruiz-Santos M, Rodríguez-Carrillo MD, Aguilar-Córcoles S, Montés-Micó R, Tañá-Rivero P.
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2021 Apr 21; 18(4):387-393. PubMed ID: 33730515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comprehensive Comparison of Axial Length Measurement With Three Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometers and Partial Coherence Interferometry.
    Huang J, Chen H, Li Y, Chen Z, Gao R, Yu J, Zhao Y, Lu W, McAlinden C, Wang Q.
    J Refract Surg; 2019 Feb 01; 35(2):115-120. PubMed ID: 30742226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Repeatability of 2 swept-source OCT biometers and 1 optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Fişuş AD, Hirnschall ND, Ruiss M, Pilwachs C, Georgiev S, Findl O.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2021 Oct 01; 47(10):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 33770018
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Ocular biometry in dense cataracts: Comparison of partial-coherence interferometry, swept-source optical coherence tomography and immersion ultrasound.
    González-Godínez S, Saucedo-Urdapilleta R, Mayorquín-Ruiz M, Velasco-Barona C, Moragrega-Adame E, Domínguez-Varela IA, Gonzalez-Salinas R.
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2022 Jan 01; 70(1):107-111. PubMed ID: 34937218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Refractive prediction of four different intraocular lens calculation formulas compared between new swept source optical coherence tomography and partial coherence interferometry.
    Song MY, Noh SR, Kim KY.
    PLoS One; 2021 Jan 01; 16(5):e0251152. PubMed ID: 33945581
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between Argos® and IOLMaster 700®: Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers.
    Porwolik M, Porwolik A, Mrukwa-Kominek E.
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2024 Jun 27; 60(7):. PubMed ID: 39064485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of a new optical biometer using swept-source optical coherence tomography and a biometer using optical low-coherence reflectometry.
    Hoffer KJ, Hoffmann PC, Savini G.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Aug 27; 42(8):1165-72. PubMed ID: 27531293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Repeatability of new optical biometer and agreement with 2 validated optical biometers, all based on SS-OCT.
    Galzignato A, Lupardi E, Hoffer KJ, Barboni P, Schiano-Lomoriello D, Savini G.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2023 Jan 01; 49(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 36026703
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Repeatability and reproducibility of optical biometry implemented in a new optical coherence tomographer and comparison with a optical low-coherence reflectometer.
    Kanclerz P, Hoffer KJ, Rozema JJ, Przewłócka K, Savini G.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2019 Nov 01; 45(11):1619-1624. PubMed ID: 31706516
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical comparison of a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and a time-domain optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer.
    Srivannaboon S, Chirapapaisan C, Chonpimai P, Loket S.
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Oct 01; 41(10):2224-32. PubMed ID: 26703299
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 33.