These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

343 related items for PubMed ID: 2376065

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM, Sudeep PT, Bhat KS.
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP.
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W, Peng D, Smales RJ, Yip KH.
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S, Baratieri LN, de Andrada MA, Monteiro Júnior S, Ritter AV.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV, Johnson GH, Gordon GE.
    Oper Dent; 1995 Oct; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA, Fontana UF, Cury JA, Serra MC, Elderton RJ.
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Removal of amalgam, glass-ionomer cement and compomer restorations: changes in cavity dimensions and duration of the procedure.
    Szep S, Baum C, Alamouti C, Schmidt D, Gerhardt T, Heidemann D.
    Oper Dent; 2002 Jun; 27(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 12413228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F, Jesen ME.
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J, Donly KJ.
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 18.